Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
...that would stop President Trump from withdrawing U.S. forces from South Korea without the Pentagon’s input.

That's a thing he is exceedingly unlikely to do in any case. But last I heard, the Pentagon works for him.

8 posted on 06/13/2018 11:20:33 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

The whole proposal is grandstanding. They couldn’t even put the words in to prevent him from removing troops from SK because they know they cannot do so. The best they could do is say Trump has to discuss it with the Pentagon first.

Since Trump is the CIC that is a non starter.


14 posted on 06/13/2018 11:29:22 AM PDT by billyboy15 (S re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill

During WWII, didn’t Patton have to get approval from the privates under his command before he could give them orders?

/s


18 posted on 06/13/2018 11:36:09 AM PDT by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm using my wife's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill

I suspect there will be an ostentatious removal of nuclear assets in South Korea, ships in port will leave and not return but troops pulled out? a token amount, perhaps, but troops will stay there. Those troops speak to China, not really to Norkea. Norkea would NOT invade without an OK from Peking.


37 posted on 06/13/2018 12:15:02 PM PDT by arthurus (bqcdb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson