Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States
PLOS Medicine ^ | 6/12/2018 | Jacqueline K. Olive, Peter J. Hotez , Ashish Damania, Melissa S. Nolan

Posted on 06/13/2018 5:10:04 PM PDT by spintreebob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: exDemMom

Infectious diseases are still a major cause of death in the world.

And in the US they are acquired 2 ways overwhelmingly
#1. Hospitals and healthcare facilities.
#2. Drugs and promiscuous sex.

In the civilized world, the rate of serious infectious disease outside #1 and #2 is extremely low.


61 posted on 06/14/2018 5:58:04 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

By specifically mentioning philosophical and not religious objection, they are referring to highly educated IT workers, and their gender studies major partners. Very few Blacks or Hispanics. Maybe a few Asians.


62 posted on 06/14/2018 6:02:21 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I could send you studies by a well known IT company famous for its use of AI in health. They started with the thesis that vaccines are effective and cost effective. Then they cherry picked the data (my data) to prove it. They proved absolutely nothing, not their thesis, the the opposite of their thesis.

I only have my 6 million person data right now, not everybody else’s data. But a cursory look at these studies reveals that they start with 2 motivations
1) Get published, get ego massaged
2) Get more funding by telling the funding source what it wants to hear. Tell me, how often does a funded study come up with the answer that the funding source does not want to hear? What is the statistical probability of that?

But I won’t share the study because I work with that big AI healthcare company and hope to steer the studies of “my” data to more factual and honest conclusions.


63 posted on 06/14/2018 6:10:09 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
Infectious diseases are still a major cause of death in the world.

And in the US they are acquired 2 ways overwhelmingly
#1. Hospitals and healthcare facilities.
#2. Drugs and promiscuous sex.

In the civilized world, the rate of serious infectious disease outside #1 and #2 is extremely low.


And the reason for that? (Think, think, think...) Hmmm... vaccinations maybe?
64 posted on 06/14/2018 6:10:12 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

#1 In the civilized world, as everywhere else, the primary route of infection is contact or close proximity to infected people, or contact with insects that carry disease. You do not have to be anywhere near a hospital to get an infectious disease.

#2 While the behavior of addicts might cause them to forego basic hygiene measures, drugs do not cause infectious disease. In addition, most infectious diseases are not STDs.

For your reading pleasure, you can look up the CDC’s weekly compendium of infectious disease deaths.

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/index.html.

https://wonder.cdc.gov/nndss/static/2018/23/2018-23-table1.html


65 posted on 06/14/2018 6:18:27 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

That’s OK, the CDC gets much of its data from my database.

Infectious disease ranges from common cold and flu to life threatening. Of course a few do die from cold and flu. Amazingling most of the ones who die from these, acquire it in healthcare facilities. That is because it is the weak who are already in a healthcare facility who are most vulnerable. And infectious disease is far more common in healthcare facilities than most anywhere else.

As for lifestyle and infectious disease, bad lifestyle leads to STDs... But it also leads to a lot of other infectious diseases besides STDs.

Yes, the rest of us do get infectious disease. The entire population can be separated into 3 or 4 categories. First, there is a bump in cost for infant and maternity costs. The single biggest cost factor in this is moms with bad lifestyles.

Then there are children 1-18. The average cost per child is extremely small, almost insignificant when compared to the other categories. But even here, Drugs and bad lifestyle are by far the #1 cost.

At the other extreme are us senior citizens. All of us are going to die. It takes a lot of money to keep us alive ... just a little while longer. But that is our society. Even with seniors, bad lifestyle takes an amazing percentage of the total cost.

In between are adults. This is the group with the largest gap between healthy and unhealthy. A small but growing faction have unhealthy lifestyles and amount to a disproportionate share of costs and an even bigger gap between what they pay in and what they get back.

Sorry if I focus on the cost. That is where my head is at this week.


66 posted on 06/15/2018 3:25:23 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson