Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
The agents still get there, it’s in a different manner.

True. But take the chicken pox vaccination as an example. If a child gets chicken pox naturally, he's got lifetime immunity, almost guaranteed. With the vaccine, he will need to get regular boosters or his immunity may wear off. In this case, at least, the immunity conferred by a natural infection ends up being better than that from the vaccine. One wonders if that's the case for some other vaccines as well.

That said, I do agree that for illnesses that have higher rates of death and disabilities associated with them, it's better to get the shot. No one would suggest it's better to get something like polio naturally.
58 posted on 06/14/2018 11:16:55 AM PDT by Antoninus ("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus

Older methods of warding off smallpox involved inducing a mild chicken pox infection.

A major tenet of modern medicine is that it’s better to control something than not to control it. Controlling something automatically implies a science. But the option to get so much chicken pox “inoculation” that one comes down with a mild case, is ruled out by modern medicine as unethical. What to do, what to do. It’s a conundrum. Universal vaccination opponents have some great points to make. But I could also hope to be heard when I ask them please don’t take their natural chicken pox cases to me.


59 posted on 06/14/2018 11:25:14 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson