Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine
"What I don’t get is the issue of “authorizing Wikileaks”. Assange is in the never-never land of a precarious embassy sanctuary. I don’t see how he responds or cares about authorization."

Because Wikileaks guarantees they will protect the source.

Did Seth Rich autorize wikileaks to reveal he was the source and if so how he got the info? Before Hillary sent him to Fort Marcy park?

17 posted on 06/14/2018 12:46:40 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

Yeah, I mentioned source confidentiality.

But, if a confisential source is murdered, would he want those responsible to escape responsibility because of that confidence? I’d say, it depends on the circumstances.


30 posted on 06/14/2018 1:12:07 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson