I am actually approving that immunity was not granted to McCabe. It tells me the government does not need his testimony, they have enough to convict him and others.
Before any prosecution can commence they would have to find someone not tainted by their own complicity in the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Does that person exist?
I am actually approving that immunity was not granted to McCabe. It tells me the government does not need his testimony, they have enough to convict him and others.
Most certainly the government has the text messages between Page, trzok and “Andy”...
Yes, I’m sure that there are enough FBI agents that are willing to testify to the crimes committed to get the job done.
Trump has many times complemented the rank and file Agents. If fully exposed this is the largest/worst criminal conspiracy in the history of the US government.
It is Time. Expose em All to daylight disinfectant. No matter who is hurt.
He was already caught lying. Immunity does not relieve you of lying.
“I am actually approving that immunity was not granted to McCabe. It tells me the government does not need his testimony, they have enough to convict him and others.”
Mueller would have to approve.
I think there is enough evidence for two or three convictions...probably not totalling more than a full-year in prison. The question would be....if you had a real Attorney General (instead of a fake one), would he go for the bold stuff and threaten McCabe with five years in prison?
Me too. At first I thought "give it to him, then squeeze everything out of him" but someone else here pointed out that if he gets it, he'll say "it was all me, I did it all. I broke every law in the book, I wrote the dossier personally and forged the signatures of everyone else, I stole everyones phones and planted fake texts, I personally leaked everything to the press including all the classified leaks. It ... was ... all ... ME!"
Then what? Try to trap him with perjury but in the meantime everyone else says "well obviously there's reasonable doubt regarding my role in this, isn't there?"
Better to not court that possibility.