The owners of the Red Hen should be allowed to patronize who they want. In a way they’re exercising their right to free expression. This is the beauty of the 1A. It allows us to recognize the fools amongst us. A gov’t entity attempted to compel a Chrisian bakery to go against their deeply held beliefs. As far as the Red Hen their rights do not shield them from the negative consequences of their actions. No litigation necessary, let the court of public opinion speak for itself.
I totally agree. The dummy of an owner has every right to run her restaurant into the ground as she pleases. We have a right to condemn her for it as we please.