Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Hands Trump The Power To Fire Thousands Of Judges (Wonderful News Alert)
Washington Post 24 ^ | June 25, 2018

Posted on 06/24/2018 10:03:13 PM PDT by Zakeet

Perhaps the biggest roadblock to Trump’s MAGA agenda has been radical, liberal judges. These men and women, appointed by previous presidents and other powers, have interfered with President Trump’s lawful authority.

But that’s all about to change.

Judges are supposed to be impartial. They have a solemn duty to uphold our laws. Decisions made by judges can decide the fate of not just one person, but millions. Judges that preside over federal issues can very well affect the lives of every last American.

We’ve seen how radical judges can harm our country. Obama-appointed judges have overstepped their bounds by attacking Trump’s lawful executive orders. They have allowed their personal, political views to violate their responsibilities.

Not only that, but certain groups within our government have been appointing judges—without the approval of the president. This is clearly a violation of the Constitution. Thankfully, the Supreme Court felt so too. Now many questionable judges are about to get their walking papers.

From Reuters:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday expanded presidential control over pivotal jobs in federal agencies, ruling that the way the Securities and Exchange Commission selected its in-house judges to enforce investor-protection laws was improper.

In a 7-2 ruling, the justices overturned a lower court ruling that had endorsed the SEC’s in-house judge hiring practice that operated autonomously from the president.

The ruling could reverberate through the federal government, which has nearly 2,000 administrative law judges deciding matters as varied as unfair trade practices, veterans benefits and patent infringement. Such a ruling could also make it easier for some of these judges to be fired by political appointees.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost24.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: administrativelaw; jailforjudges; judgeimpeachment; judges; judicialactivism; ruleoflaw; scotus; supremecourt; trump; trumpjudiciary; trumpscotus; trumpwinning; winning; yourefired
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Zakeet

HALLELUJAH!


21 posted on 06/24/2018 11:20:26 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Sure it’s great when we’re in the driver’s seat, but imagine another Obama coming along. He’d take the cleaver to every decent judge he could.”

No. If he fires them and replaces them with a presidential appointment confirmed by the senate, then the Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t apply—because the new ones are properly appointed.


22 posted on 06/24/2018 11:22:22 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

That is a start. These guys need to go, maybe to a prison camp in Northeast Alaska


23 posted on 06/24/2018 11:31:07 PM PDT by BigEdLB (BigEdLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Well, that dream was certainly short lived.
Misleading articles and fake news once again.


24 posted on 06/24/2018 11:32:22 PM PDT by V K Lee (Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly mistaken. - US Pres. Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Yeah.
‘Administrative judge’ isn’t a munificent position compared to practise, or an Article 3 position.
And this doesn’t seem to be “news” to me- though I might be mistaken.

Still, lots of Obama appointments could be replaced with real judges.


25 posted on 06/24/2018 11:36:27 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

[[Maybe it’s time to write a speech or two about the notorious 9th Circuit Court. Let them sweat a little bit.]]

He should start writing cryptic tweets hinting that he will be firing them


26 posted on 06/25/2018 12:32:28 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Look at the website. 'Washington Post 24' is a conservative website that has nothing to do with The Washington Post.
27 posted on 06/25/2018 12:47:19 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

My apologies to WashingtonPost24. Sorry.


28 posted on 06/25/2018 1:07:42 AM PDT by upchuck (Perception is reality and reality is whatever I decide it to be. ~ tinyurl.com/congressmanx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Make a rule if the Supreme Court overrules your judgement, you can be fired by POTUS!
29 posted on 06/25/2018 1:28:42 AM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
The important question is who is eligible. Are there sitting judges in federal courts not approved by the Senate? I doubt it.

Correct. The decision is about administrative judges appointed within the agencies, not district or appeals court judges who are nominated and confirmed by the Senate for life.

Don't get your panties moist guys; the Ninth Circuit and the Hawaiian district court nut isn't going anywhere.

30 posted on 06/25/2018 1:45:40 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Good news! This ruling is so needed.


31 posted on 06/25/2018 2:07:34 AM PDT by jazzlite (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Love this!


32 posted on 06/25/2018 2:12:25 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
This seems to be about administrative law judges only.

It is, and it's effect (even if fully taken advantage of) would be marginal. The fact of the story don't match the screeching headline.

33 posted on 06/25/2018 2:40:49 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Misleading headline from the known liars at the Washington Post...

The Supreme Court does NOT make laws.... Haha! S.M.H. They interpret the U.S. Constitution. The Legislative Branch makes law, and the President signs it.

Anyhow, President Trump always had this power. They are simply confirming it by a vote of 7 to 2.


34 posted on 06/25/2018 2:58:49 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I could use a better job. do you still need that law degree thingy and/or experience to be a judge?


35 posted on 06/25/2018 3:14:57 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scram1
Sorry, no one can do that. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution states judges "shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."

You can only impeach a justice/judge that has been nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. You can't fire them or reduce their salary.

Now an administrative judge can be fired for almost any reason, so why try the reduction in salary?

36 posted on 06/25/2018 3:18:31 AM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Exactly so, Doughty!

This is why all new laws deserve DEEP contemplation before passage. Just look at the ramifications from the execrable 17th Amendment.


37 posted on 06/25/2018 3:44:48 AM PDT by DNME (The only solution to a BAD guy with a gun is a GOOD guy with a gun. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; Admin Moderator

FAKE NEWS ALERT!

Literally, fake news. WashingtonPost24 is a fake news site, trying to get credibility by creating confusion between it and the Washington Post.

The Reuters article it quotes is real, but the commentary presented as news is not at all realistic.


38 posted on 06/25/2018 3:54:39 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; Admin Moderator

(To wit: President Trump can’t just fire whatever federal workers he wants to without cause.)


39 posted on 06/25/2018 3:56:11 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Still the administrative law judges are making decision regarding the bloated and quasi illegal agencies that effect so much with so little due process.


40 posted on 06/25/2018 4:02:29 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson