To: SeekAndFind
How nice. The Christians get punished with neverending legal costs while the USSC punts it.
2 posted on
06/25/2018 8:05:15 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: SeekAndFind
First, Thomas was concurring, not dissenting, in Masterpiece Cakeshop. Second, the Supreme Court did nothing more than follow you standard procedure in
Arlene's Flowers. It's called a GVR (Grant, Vacate, Remand). Basically, when it makes a decision any pending cases dealing with the same legal issue(s) have there lower court decision vacated (voided) and the case(s) are sent back to the lower court.
So Arlene's Flowers will go back to the court from which it originated so that court can review it in light of Masterpiece Cakeshop. Nothing unusual here.
3 posted on
06/25/2018 8:27:57 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: SeekAndFind
Methinks SCOTUS is telling Washington court, “We’re watching you.”
4 posted on
06/25/2018 9:10:30 PM PDT by
NetAddicted
(Just looking)
To: SeekAndFind
The problem with the “Masterpiece Cake” ruling is that it implies that if they hadn’t outright called him a Nazi, ordering him to make the cake or shut down would have been upheld.
6 posted on
06/25/2018 9:58:04 PM PDT by
tbw2
To: SeekAndFind
They could have just said the flower shop is covered by the baker decision. Why punt? Its done!
10 posted on
06/26/2018 4:29:17 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you)
To: SeekAndFind
SCOTUS did the same thing in Caetano v Massachusetts,a 2nd Amendment case from 2016.They told the Massachusetts courts to reconsider their decision in light of Heller v District of Columbia.And the Massachusetts courts responded by striking down the legislation they had previously upheld,which denied Caetano her basic Constitutional rights.
13 posted on
06/26/2018 6:35:39 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
To: SeekAndFind
There is no such effing thing as "gay rights!"What these SODOMITES want is special rights, that are set apart and above every other citizen.
If I, as a bartender and proprietor of a bar, have reserved to me the right to refuse service to anyone - and such right to this day stands unchallenged in the courts - ten the same legal reasoning applies to EVERY other business.
Under the Constitution, no private individual or government entity can force another individual to act against their will. You may only prohibit those actions that threaten public safety, peaceful order, or life and property.
14 posted on
06/26/2018 7:32:57 AM PDT by
JME_FAN
(uired to)
To: SeekAndFind
17 posted on
06/26/2018 9:34:29 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(Trump is a real estate genius because he lives rent-free in so many heads.)
To: SeekAndFind
Definitely a Punt!
18 posted on
06/26/2018 12:11:26 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson