I don’t think that’s the case. Let’s not forget that he had kept Gay Days around despite being in the perfect position to get rid of it, and if anything, he actually tried to outright advertise it on the Disney website, which was even noted on FOX. Not to mention he was also involved in both the censoring of Path to 9/11 and in burying the DVD release to such an extent that Disney didn’t even sell the rights despite having one prospective buyer, Lion’s Gate Productions. And both instances were done specifically due to the Clintons in some way shape or form: The former was because the Clintons, in Alinsky style, engineered a media circus and ordered him to follow through with censoring it, and the latter was done at their behest in order to ensure that Hillary Clinton could get the nomination for the presidency. If anything, he’s more likely to just support the radical left, not even caring if Disney doesn’t turn out a profit. I actually wonder why Disney hired him to replace Eisner, especially when, buying back Oswald the Lucky Rabbit’s rights aside, he has not done any good for Disney and if anything may have made Disney even WORSE off than before.
Disney, IMO, went down hill when they, the BOD, got rid of the Disney family members, and installed whatshisname, the former US Senate Majority Leader, as the Chairman.