Posted on 06/27/2018 3:02:10 PM PDT by Biggirl
No. We can’t afford to lose a Republican in the Senate.
No. We can’t afford to lose a Republican in the Senate.
.
The ignorance is clearly yours alone!
.
That’s okay. I just wrote a note to you calling to question Lee’s ability to see Constitutional matters clearly.
You can ignore it if you like.
And yet you didn’t loft a reasoned refutation of anything I said.
You just got upset.
.
Reason has nothing to do with your emotional anti-america mania.
Your penchant for being unnecessarily disruptive just loves attention I guess.
.
He’s trolling.
You’re all upset because I took three men to task. Evidently they’re your heroes. They are not mine.
These three heroes of yours threw every piece of dirt at Trump they could find or think up.
Beck called Trump pathological. Ted refused to campaign for Trump for more than about an hour after he lost the nomination to him.
With the choice between Clinton and Trump, Ted really couldn’t see any reason to try to defeat Hillary, even if he did hate Trump.
Levin blistered Trump non-stop for a year. Several weeks before the election he did come around. This after broadcasting anti-Trump things non-stop for a year.
The choice was Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, and these three brain-trusts couldn’t figure it out.
Now that I take them to task on it and will never let it be forgotten, you have this to say, “Reason has nothing to do with your emotional anti-america mania. Your penchant for being unnecessarily disruptive just loves attention I guess.
Guess would have to be what your doing, because on this subject you can’t think your way out of a paper bag.
For your information, Hillary Clinton is the most anti-American candidate in our nation’s history. She lost the 2016 election by a whisker. Those three men were too stupid to get in her way, and do everything they could to stop her.
In light of this, who is the anti-American here?
Me for pointing this out, or you for trying to shut me up, when I’m telling you the truth?
.
Get serious!
Have I ever defended Beck?
Levin just kept Trump honest.
Cruz just won the states that made the difference for Trump at his own expence.
You are trolling the forum.
Levin was not better than Beck. Cruz was no better than Levin. Beck was no better than Cruz.
If you defend one of them, you defend all three.
Since when is tell the truth trolling?
These three men worked against us in 2016.
CRUZ DID NOT help Trump win the states that made the difference. That is total B. S. That crap and things like it is why I continue to beat these three men to a pulp.
The last Saturday before the election, Teddy attended three rallies. At the first one, he refused to mention the name “Donald Trump”. Tell me how you win a state for a guy by refusing to mention the cadidate’s name and advocate people vote for him.
The next two rallies, Ted stood up and made a short speech. And this less than 20 minute exercise is described by you as winning several key states.
That’s pure fantasy.
No, I’m telling the truth. You are the one trolling, because you don’t like the truth. You idols are coming under fire, and for damned good cause.
,
You’re living in trollhaven dreamland!
.
Well that’s all you’ve got left to say, since you have nothing to refute what I have stated.
All your objections don’t change the truth one bit.
You’ll have to live with it, just like those three brain-trust wanna-bes will.
BTW: There was one other nonsensical thing you touched on. It was the idea that Levin was keeping Trump on the straight and narrow. That’s as if he had to. LOL
Trump presented his platform in June of 2015, and he never wavered on it.
Cruzbots think Ted won those states for Trump. Levinbots think Levin kept him on the Conservative track, helping him to win.
Those two claims are hysterically funny.
Ted is supposed to be the Angel of elections, and Levin is the hall monitor of record.
Both were lost in the ozone in 2016.
Trump was the only one of them that was concise, tireless, and taking steps to do everything he could to stop Hillary.
Levin and Beck were taking every action they could to make sure Trump was never elected. Ted was just too busy to worry about the future of our nation.
Show me a Conservative who can’t get emotionally involved in preventing Hillary from being elected, and I’ll show you a number of Conservatives who will never lift a finger to get them elected.
.
Troll on fool!
You haven’t shot down a single thing I’ve said on point.
None the less you call me a fool.
It would seem to me all the hissing and moaning you’ve been doing, was because you couldn’t loft a decent rebuttal.
I know you don’t like the truth, but it’s not changing.
Lee is a reliable conservative who will be faithful to the constitution. I wouldn’t have to worry about him changing his stripes a la some of the previous stealth nominees...
I can’t say for sure if you’re right or not.
All I can do is look at his history and see if I can find any warning signs.
That issue of the CIC and whether he can use our armed forces before notifying Congress is exactly the type of issue that Lee would face.
It’s a settled issue, and he doesn’t know it.
What other things does he not know?
This is an easy right down the middle of the plate issue. He swung and he missed.
It didn’t take me three minutes to find that when I decided to look and see what some of his views were.
If it was anyone else, would you be leery if they didn’t understand this issue, and there was a possibility of them being appointed to the SCOTUS?
While he may have been well meaning here, I don’t think it’s deniable that he wasn’t sticking to the Constitution.
So, who are you sure of as a nominee?
I’m not sure about any of them yet. I haven’t studied the list, and I don’t know enough about any of them to loft them as the one who should get the nod.
I’m not saying Lee should never be considered either. I just found that troubling.
With sitting judges it can sometimes be tricky too. If they’ve flown under the radar for their career, you may not find much on them.
Some rulings that seemed to back the Leftist view on things might be revealing.
I’m a bit leery of these supposed good nomination agencies (or whatever they actually are), that provide lists.
Sandra Day O’Connor looked good in her day. She went south on Reagan.
Some of them are judges that have writings and a very clear picture of who they are and how they think.
A Bork type would be excellent.
Thank you! You know what’s funny is that Mark had the audacity to criticize the Never Trumpers, when he was one himself!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.