Who does this include/not include. Sounds elitist.
The Constitutional story on firearms isn’t about any kind of permits (open carry or concealed carry) which is what the Republican Party and its allied front groups have convinced many is the Second Amendment’s front line of defense.
There’s been a retreat from the front line of the 2A over the decades because of fear of gangsters in the 1930’s and fear of assassins in the 1960’s and fear of mass murderers in recent times.
Here in Minnesota we’ve had courts banning carry in court buildings - and in public libraries that were “in the same building” as the courts, in that they shared a wall but had no interior door between them.
So, in Mississippi you can now carry concealed in the state courthouse?
Nothing soils a black-robed clown’s adult diaper faster than realizing that a peasant can have an “equalizer”...
Yes, it seems comically obvious on the face of it, but sadly tHat is an all too rare occurrence in America today. Many liberal politicians oppose their own state Constitutions and ate able to find appeals courts loke the Ninth Circus to do their bidding. You would hope in a sane America, every court would uphold its state’s constitution, but it is not so. Many judicial activists simply ignore their states’s constitutions and overrule them capriciously. Liberals don’t care. The ends justify the means to liberal commie Rats. They are unlawful tyrants.
Mississippi ping