Posted on 06/28/2018 11:20:40 AM PDT by deplorableindc
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Thursday that the Justice Department still could prosecute former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information using a private server.
Rosenstein didn't say it was likely, but told lawmakers it was possible -- even if the investigation was declared over nearly two years ago, with FBI Director James Comey announcing he would not recommend charges.
"In the event the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed and it meets our principles of federal prosecution, yes, we would prosecute it," Rosenstein said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
“If there was any evidence that water was wet or that the sky was dark at night...
But gosh, we just don’t know”
Could....but won’t.
“In the event the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed and it meets our principles of federal prosecution, yes, we would prosecute it,” Rosenstein said.”
How many smoking guns does this asswipe need?
“In the event the evidence is sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime was committed and it meets our principles of federal prosecution, yes, we would prosecute it,” Rosenstein said.
Why is this lying filth not strapped to a gurney?
There is no doubt that they will NOT prosecute her.There is some much evidence of her guilt they could force her to plead out.
What principles?
Wow, this guy is sharp...
Tell us something we didn’t know, brain trust.
Why hasn’t anyone asked him why he signed a FISA warrant?
Why is this lying filth not strapped to a gurney?
—
He almost makes Comey look likable.
Why hasn’t anyone asked him why he signed a FISA warrant?
-
I think they have and he refused to answer.
He was asked that many times. His answer.....Uh uh uh uh
Hillary Clinton “lost” $6,000,000,000 of hard-earned Taxpayer money in Libya.
I say we let her work it off cleaning toilets in the Rest Areas on the Interstate.
......presuming they can find an unreasonable prosecutor.
Assign a dedicated Prosecutor to open a full fledged investigation into the Weiner laptop treasure trove of 700,000 emails. Start with Abedin sending and receiving classified info and go after ALL crimes revealed.
That would bring down EVERYONE.
I don't think that is the standard for bringing an indictment, it's the standard for getting a conviction. Why would the FBI have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt before they would prosecute? By the way, they already have. But still.
In opposition to all the other posters on this thread, I think this is great.
Either they are getting so close to the truth that people are willing to bail on Clinton; or this was a broadside against Clinton telling her to get out.
Either way, just admitting she could still be charged is a whole lot of HUH for rabid supporters.
When Henry Ford was asked how much money was enough he reportedly replied; "Just a little bit more."
HUH even the corrupt Comey gave a list of crimes , when is this turd going to be replaced and clean the swamp
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.