Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

We have a conservative SC now? Only 2 judges dissented from the opinion that the case shouldn’t be heard?

“We conclude that the Constitution does not allow what happened in Rowan County,” the court’s opinion said. “The prayer practice served to identify the government with Christianity and risked conveying to citizens of minority faiths a message of exclusion.”

The Constitution forbids the government from indention with a religion? Even allowing that lie, the fact is that the committee could allow other faiths to pray before the meeting, and the claim that the gov ‘excluded’ anyone would be invalidated


5 posted on 06/29/2018 10:19:53 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/394608-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-fight-over-north-carolina-county?__twitter_impression=true

The Supreme Court did not give an explanation for its decision as is customary in orders. Justice Clarence Thomas joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented from the court’s refusal to take the case.

Thomas said the Fourth Circuit’s decision is “both unfaithful to our precedents and ahistorical.”

“It also conflicts with a recent en banc decision of the Sixth Circuit,” he said.

Thomas said the 6th Circuit in 2017 upheld a municipal prayer policy virtually identical to the one in Rowan.

“Thus, the Sixth and Fourth Circuits are now split on the legality of legislator-led prayer,” he said.

“State and local lawmakers can lead prayers in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan, but not in South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, or West Virginia. This Court should have stepped in to resolve this conflict.”


13 posted on 06/29/2018 10:29:17 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434

Oh gee their were only Democrats and no Buddhists, Shinto, wiccan or green moon god followers....


38 posted on 06/29/2018 11:05:03 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434

I call BS


65 posted on 06/29/2018 12:19:26 PM PDT by luvie (Our troops are the best of the best and we should honor them EVERY day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434

Correct. The Constitution forbids Congress from passing any laws that have anything to do with an establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof.

A local government that allows prayer during their meetings is supporting the Constitution of the United States, without regard to the individual’s religion or religious expression.

Anything more than that is not in the actions of the local government, but in the mind of the complainer, er, hearer.


83 posted on 06/29/2018 2:15:20 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434

Thomas is correct. There is a conflict between 2 Appeals Courts that is required to be settled by the USSC. The 7 justices who punted ought to be ashamed of themselves.


84 posted on 06/29/2018 2:19:38 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson