Because the WaPo is such a reliable source. /s
Multiple sources in and out of the East Asian region have had similar reports, based on expert analysis of openly available satellite images.
Multiple sources in and out of the East Asian region have had similar reports, based on expert analysis of openly available satellite images.
___________________________________________________________
Everything the WaPo writes is a lie including the “and’s” and the “the’s.”
This? https://www.38north.org/2018/06/yongbyon062618/ It is mush. They fail to give dates for much of any of the "iinfrastructure improvements" other the pipe and the meaningless small building. Their "rapid pace" claim is unsupported due to failure to supply dates for most change which themselves are not very meaningful. Also they admit there is evidence that the reactor has been shut down although they weaselword about the lack of evidence as if they are not satellite imagery analysis experts.
It is not the content of the surveillance, it is the WaPo interpretation of what it means that is of questionable reliability. And the implication that somehow the Trump team is living in lala land with regard to NK.
If only the WaPo had been so helpful in guiding Obama.