I'm just reporting what's going to be rammed down our throats for months.
However....if it were overturned and a decade went by, Americans would never notice it was gone.
And 99.9% surveyed never read the Supreme Courts decision in Roe v Wade. A full 100% do not know the definition of, prenumbra.
So, about 20% of those that believe that don't know those restrictions can only occur if Roe is struck down.
Popularity has zero, zip, nada to do with Constitutional legal reasoning. The idea that popularity should be considered in Supreme Court decisions ought to be considered treasonous, as it undermines the fact that the Constitution makes it clear that we the people, acting through the legislative processes are to be the authors of changes to the Constitution, not the courts.
After seeing that referendum sail through in Ireland I shudder to think how many people really think that baby killing is just hunky-dory.
The question was probably “Do you support RVW which gave women a right to choose whether or not to have children”, or some other slanted question.
Ask the same people about what “July 4th, Independence Day” stands for and you will likely get the same result; 2-1 admitting they haven’t the slightest clue except it is a day for fireworks, beer and hamburgers, and the beach.
"Like everybody else, we got it wrong," said Tony Romando, CEO of Topix Media, after shipping the Hillary Clinton victory edition of Newsweek Magazine.Polls, lately, are little more than tools of deception.
If you showed a pregnant woman and pictures of terms of development with the latest 3D Ultrasound they would still rationalize the idiot notion of privacy and a woman’s choice. A good portion of society accepts plain infanticide for women’s convenience, “human right” and just the “Constitutionality” of it.
Two wolves and a lamb voting on what’s for dinner.
B.S.
Such BS...Millions and millions of women for centuries did NOT abort their children. Why?? Because they didn’t believe in it.
Meadow muffins.
5.56mm
Rape and Incest: Just 1% of All Abortions - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/13/us/rape-and-incest-just-1-of-all-abortions.html
This is a push-poll, nothing more, with results easily manipulated based on how you ask the question. 70% of people have no idea what overturning Roe v Wade would do and not do.
Men need Roe v. Wade so they can have unprotected sex without any worries about romance, long term commitments or financial responsibility.
What gives this away as an outright biased sampling is the result that only 19 percent of the people questioned think the Supreme Court is too liberal, while 31 percent say it is too conservative. The Supreme Court too conservative by a 3 to 2 margin? Definitely a biased sample.
But most legal scholars think it was poorly argued and decided - if it turns out to be inconsistent with a more strict-constructionist Constitutional interpretation of the law, and gets overturned - too bad.....
I now know what Quinnipiac polls are from what they say in this one. If that poll was telling the truth, the democrats would allow a referendum vote, the results of which would solve the issue. There is no way this poll is anywhere near accurate.