Klayman Supports Barrett for SCOTUS Seat, Says Democrats Are "Trying to Smear Her"

newsmax.com ^ | 7/3/18 | Newsmax

[gibsonguy]

“Poor Schumer...Dems must be really p***** cuz if he hadn’t filibustered Gorsuch, they’d still have the super majority card to play. “

It was an idiotic move. Gorsuch did not change the balance. So why use biggest weapon and lose it? I suppose they so angry after they went through the trouble of having Scalia killed for naught they weren’t thinking clearly.

[unread]

"Save the woman’s seat."??? What the hell is that.??? We have seats now that belong to gender based individuals..?? We got a sodomite seat, we got a black seat, we got a white seat..??? Where's the Asian seat?? Who holds the man queer seat.?? Witch one is the dike seat..??? Wop, Jew, Mulatto, Dago.... Everybody gets a seat??? I WANT CONSTATUTIONAL LAW AND ORDER..! Where the hell is MY SEAT..!!! It sure the hell ain't Ruth Bader Ginsburg..!! She has NEVER made a decision based on Constitutional law..!!

FFFSSTTT..!!! never mind.

[Old Yeller]

The Dems hate Catholics and conservative women.

Heck, most Catholics are democrats. And in this country, soon most Catholics will be Mexicans.

[Cen-Tejas]

I like Klayman a lot but I think he is being naïve on this point. The democrats will make up something to smear her. It’s absolutely guaranteed.

[a little elbow grease]

"Stay clear of Barrett. A law professor at Notre Dame, a very liberal college that even covered religious statues to please Obama. Little or no record of her decisions from the bench."

_______________

I may agree. But may I add .....

Yesterday I was thinking that maybe Trump would nominate her to eventually watch her be a sacrificial lamb" to the sick Dems.' hatred.

In that way, she would not be nominated, Trump then could easily point out how religiously ILL the liberals are........... and he WINS again.

Then he nominates someone who he really wants.

(Just a guess.)

[LS]

Slightly different concern. Prior to Gorsuch, we had 6 Catholics and 3 Jews on the USSC-—but not a single “mainstream” Protestant.

This is significant, for the American Protestant churches were the foundation of the US, remain the overwhelming majority religion of the U.S., and yet have zero representation on the Court. Barrett would be another Catholic.

Were the “quota” people to be taken into consideration, five of the justices should be non-Anglican/Episcopalian Protestants. (Anglicanism and Episcopalianism are top-down in their governance, while most of the other Protestant churches are congregational, i.e., bottom up. I think this DOES at some point play a part in how one views the constitution. “Top-downers” tend to side with the federal government.)

[a little elbow grease]

"I don’t understand why some of the geriatrics like Ginsburg are sticking in there."

_______________________________________

Are you kidding me?

Ruth still harbors the thought that she's young and still looks like Loretta Young's little sister.

...... actually very pretty.

[oldtech]

A good clue as to her worth can be judged by how much the Democrats try to smear her. She sounds like a good choice.

[a little elbow grease]

I really did not understand all that.

Do you think she'll be nominated?

I tend to think that her chances of being nominated are about as high as the Pittsburgh Pirates having an intelligent lineup any time soon.

;-)

[reasonisfaith]

Sounds like she’s an excellent wife to Jesse, a devoted mother and a very impressive judge.

[a little elbow grease]

.....agreed.

[a little elbow grease]

"The preemptive smear campaign says they’re scared sh**less of this woman. If they really thought they could sink her, they’d have waited until after her nomination to do so"

_________________________

Maybe find some pubes on a Coke can?

[a little elbow grease]

"It has occurred to me that she may be senile with dementia. She may be refusing to retire because she does not have good judgment."

________

No ..... I don't think she's "senile with dementia". She has the judgment ...... her judgment is to outlast the bastard Conservatives.

[Chickensoup]

but she could have resigned cheerfully under Obama??

[a little elbow grease]

..... very pretty. Dems. seem to hate pretty women (with a good number of children).

[a little elbow grease]

"I WANT CONSTATUTIONAL LAW AND ORDER..! "

___________________

Spelling is not your friend.

[jpsb]

“She is a beloved teacher who has three times been voted Notre Dame’s “Outstanding Professor of the Year” by graduating classes. Adrian Vermeule, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard and noted critic of the originalist judicial philosophy with which Barrett has been associated, told me that he is almost frightened of her. “I lectured on my last book at Notre Dame and she asked the absolute sharpest, most penetrating questions. She is scary smart.”

http://theweek.com/articles/782162/amy-barrett-supreme-court

[BradyLS]

I’m sure Justice Ginsburg expects to be on the bench for as long as she’s breathing.

[unread]

"Spelling is not your friend."

This is true... My clerical abilitys really stink... The result of a unfortunate childhood... :(

[kenmcg]

” Yesterday I was thinking that maybe Trump would nominate her to eventually watch her be a sacrificial lamb” to the sick Dems.’ hatred.

In that way, she would not be nominated, Trump then could easily point out how religiously ILL the liberals are........... and he WINS again.

Then he nominates someone who he really wants.”

Recall when Sandra Day O’Connor was nominated, they had us believing she was the second coming. What a dud she turned out to be. There is something about the water along the beltway.