To: All
.......you can judge the caliber of President Trumps Supreme Court nominee by how angry the Democrats get.
The smarter and more influential the nominee, the more qualified they are, the angrier Democrats will get....... Good rule.
2 posted on
07/05/2018 7:52:37 AM PDT by
Liz
( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: rogerantone1
I’d like to someday see a headline that “Republicans celebrate Democrat outrage”
3 posted on
07/05/2018 7:52:40 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: rogerantone1
That’s a valid rule of thumb for any nomination or policy decision. Gauge how vehemently the dems oppose it — the more rabid they are about it, the better decision it is.
4 posted on
07/05/2018 7:52:47 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Liberals, f**k off. That is all.)
To: rogerantone1
this guy is missing the point. trump should pick the next nominee because it the right nominee with the right principles and the right temperament, not according to how hysterical the nomination makes an already hopelessly hysterical bunch of weirdos.
To: rogerantone1
Bolshies got Kagen and Sotomayor, of course, they are going to be angry.
To: rogerantone1
I have always thought that the biggest threat of Robert Bork to the liberals was not his intellect (which was prodigious) but his persuasiveness. His argumentation was so logical that it compelled people to come along with him in a way that neither Rehnquist nor Scalia could match. Because of this ability, Bork didn’t really represent one vote on the Court but effectively two or three as he pulled Justices his way.
8 posted on
07/05/2018 8:03:42 AM PDT by
CommerceComet
(Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
To: rogerantone1
I do not think that this is a valid way to judge anything in the current climate. President Trump could nominate Maxine Waters to the Supreme Court and the left would still be mad and be protesting. There is no way to placate the current mob.
9 posted on
07/05/2018 8:11:29 AM PDT by
fireman15
To: rogerantone1
They got crazy over Souter, which shows they are crazed indiscriminately.
11 posted on
07/05/2018 8:20:29 AM PDT by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: rogerantone1
I may well manufacture A Supreme Court Justice Approval Level Meter tonight in Photoshop!
19 posted on
07/05/2018 9:44:54 AM PDT by
rlmorel
(Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
To: rogerantone1
But you haven't seen anything until Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg kicks off and has to be replaced! The RATs see that as a “Leftist Seat,” unlike Kennedy's which is the “moderate” one. Put up Amy Coney Barrett for that one and the RATs will be apoplectic! And that is why we need to widen our margin in the Senate, so Murky and Collins don't have any power. Get Tester, Manchin, Heitcamp, and maybe one or two others, and hold onto the two seats in AZ, the one in NV and the one in Tennessee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson