The way to get it overturned is for a State to pass a law limiting access to unrestricted abortions and for some stupid liberal judge or court to declare it unconstitutional.
Then the court could rule that Roe was improperly decided, just like they did with Koramatsu when the opportunity arose recently.
If the court gets 5 solid pro life justices, then States will be more or less free to whittle away at abortion and the left will either be stupid enough to challenge it or smart enough to let it be.
Could the court continue to define more strictly the definition of life? The heartbeat and blood flow comes at about 5-7 weeks, iirc.
At some point, they have to admit that the only route to life is through a mother, and that that mother herself availed herself of that route.
So, it is a “right of way” to an encircled property case in a way.