Skip to comments.
MSNBC Legal Analyst: Reasoning Behind Roe v. Wade ‘Shaky’
FinkelBlog ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 07/07/2018 9:27:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: skimbell
Didnt RvW break precedent?
41
posted on
07/07/2018 3:52:42 PM PDT
by
joshua c
(To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing and we lose.)
To: Lee25
Thats publicly. Privately they know it is garbage thats why they are so afraid of it coming up again. There are very solid arguments for right to life that were ignored in the last decision.
42
posted on
07/07/2018 3:55:55 PM PDT
by
joshua c
(To disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives. Do nothing and we lose.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Roe v. Wade = 20th Century Dred Scott
43
posted on
07/07/2018 8:13:13 PM PDT
by
lightman
(Obama's legacy in 13 letters: BLM, ISIS, & ANTIFA. New axis of evil.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If you have to resort to some twisted form of Plato’s dream to legislate from the bench that leads to tens of millions of lost lives, you may have written a weak ruling.
44
posted on
07/07/2018 8:50:02 PM PDT
by
lurk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson