Why is Rich Lowry writing about this explosive subject now?
>>Why is Rich Lowry writing about this explosive subject now?<<
because of the Kennedy replacement. RvW is on all liberals’ minds.
I haven’t read the article but I *know* that RvW was a constitutional farce, carving out a federal “right” where none existed and ALSO opposing the USC in its entirety (”LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”).
The end of RvW does NOT signal the end of abortion. It places it where it belongs: with the States.
Why not?
Why not? It;’s going to be an issue in any confirmation fight.