Posted on 07/08/2018 10:50:23 AM PDT by springwater13
“If you want to talk REAL judicial reforms against these backstabbing federal judges, it is time to rethink the rules allowing them to have a LIFETIME appointment and the ONLY method of removal from the bench being impeachment. If that means amending the U.S. constitution, so be it.“
Now you’re talking.
You are absolutely correct, she probably has those views because it was the only way she might have had a chance to win against Hillary in running for the Senate. People can look that up. Now, if she hadn't been running for Senate or in the State of NY, maybe she would not have been like that.
Al D'Amato not only ran but SERVED as Senator from the State of NY for three terms, and he was apologetically pro-life and pro-traditional marriage. People can look that up.
People can also look up Jeannie's track record, and see she was a social liberal long before she ran for Senator.
But hey, if you want another judge on SCOTUS who will vote with Darth Bader Ginsburg, by all means, get Trump to nominate her.
I'll take an actual conservative, thank you very much.
Al D'Amato not only ran but SERVED as Senator from the State of NY for three terms, and he was unapologetically pro-life and pro-traditional marriage. People can look that up.
People can also look up Jeannie's track record, and see she was a social liberal long before she ran for Senator.
But hey, if you want another judge on SCOTUS who will vote with Darth Bader Ginsburg, by all means, get Trump to nominate her.
I'll take an actual conservative, thank you very much.
NYT almost sounds sane as they try to keep “the one who really believes in God” from the bench.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.