Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rejects Long Detentions of Migrant Families, Dealing Trump Another Setback
NY Times ^ | July 9, 2018 | Miriam Jordan and Manny Fernandez

Posted on 07/09/2018 11:32:10 PM PDT by Innovative

The Trump administration on Monday lost a bid to persuade a federal court to allow long-term detention of migrant families, a significant legal setback to the president’s immigration agenda.

In a ruling that countered nearly every argument posed by the Justice Department, Judge Dolly M. Gee of the Federal District Court in Los Angeles held that there was no basis to amend a longstanding consent decree that requires children to be released to licensed care programs within 20 days. The government said that long-term confinement was the only way to avoid separating families when parents were detained on criminal charges.

Judge Gee said the administration’s request to modify the decree, the 1997 Flores agreement, was “a cynical attempt” to shift immigration policymaking to the courts in the wake of “over 20 years of congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; blackrobedclown; detentions; dncjudicialactivist; fedjudgepresident; illegalaliens; jailforjudges; juckthefudge; migrants; thebabyharpsealcure
Fine. Just take them right back to the border and release them all together back into Mexico, where they came from.
1 posted on 07/09/2018 11:32:10 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Oh but it’s okay as f*** to detain Paul Manafort in the hole for however Persecutor Bob needs, right?


2 posted on 07/09/2018 11:37:13 PM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

NO catch and release!!!


3 posted on 07/09/2018 11:50:25 PM PDT by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Sorry, but SCOTUS seems to have told these lower court thugs that POTUS, according to the LAW, has authority to enforce.

DOJ needs to use the language of that recent opinion to ignore these little ones...since it is clear the judges are merely ruling against Trump because they hate him.


4 posted on 07/10/2018 12:01:54 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

No prob., send them back swiftly.


5 posted on 07/10/2018 12:19:48 AM PDT by exnavy (America: love it or leave it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

This judge is stupid. Pres. Trump is trying to get CONGRESS to do something about the separation problem, something that Obama didn’t do in 8 years in office.

You’re damned if you “do try” but not damned if “you don’t”.

This judge should be thrown off the bench and out the door, without opening it. Might knock some sense into her head.


6 posted on 07/10/2018 12:24:56 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
a longstanding consent decree that requires children to be released to licensed care programs within 20 days.

in other words, the children can be separated from adults and held longer than 20 days as long as they are in 'licensed care programs' ? Works for me.

7 posted on 07/10/2018 12:29:37 AM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Exactly. Send them all back and the damn judge with them.

There are too damn many federal courts and judges. The Constitution only creates SCOTUS. Congress shoukd pare down the rest


8 posted on 07/10/2018 12:39:44 AM PDT by ZULU (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Uh that quote is not anything that should be in a judicial opinion.


9 posted on 07/10/2018 1:29:16 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Which’d put us back where we were, but since we can’t separate them, they think they’ve created a situation where the only choice is to release them. But there’s another option: put up fences and razor wire around the licensed care facility and lock up both mom and the kid there.


10 posted on 07/10/2018 2:18:00 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (So Long Obie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
lock up both mom and the kid there

First, you have to show that these "kids" are biologically related to the adults they are with.

11 posted on 07/10/2018 2:21:57 AM PDT by Jim Noble (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

This isn’t really a “loss” for Trump. It’s a loss for all the malcontents who insisted that illegal immigrant families need to be kept together. The judge is forcing immigration officials to put the kids in foster care — which is what they’ve been doing for years.


12 posted on 07/10/2018 2:44:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Send them back to their home countries.


13 posted on 07/10/2018 3:34:00 AM PDT by Lopeover ( The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Simple answer: give the families the option of keeping the children with the adults in detention, handing them over to other family of child protective services, or returning as a family group to their home country. Make it their call.


14 posted on 07/10/2018 4:35:14 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
the administration’s request to modify the decree, the 1997 Flores agreement, was “a cynical attempt” to shift immigration policymaking to the courts in the wake of “over 20 years of congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate.”

No. It's a cyncical attempt to get Congress to do its job.

15 posted on 07/10/2018 4:59:31 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

A Bowbama appointee! Go figure!


16 posted on 07/10/2018 5:17:44 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Boycott The NFL! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Look!

A Zerobama black-robed clown-b*tch who thinks she's the president of the United States!

Can't wait for the Suprmes to club these clowns down like baby Harp seals...

17 posted on 07/10/2018 6:28:01 AM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Juck the fudge.


18 posted on 07/10/2018 6:29:25 AM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Unless Congress makes it a policy to impeach overturned jurists, there is nothing to dissuade them from continued meddling where they don’t belong.


19 posted on 07/10/2018 7:00:00 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson