Because someday we might have to flee to Russia ourselves …
Why isn’t the USA taking in these refugees?
The only question is, why are they considering Russia rather than the US or Europe? These, some of the hardest working and most productive farmers and land managers in the world, are the sort of legitimate refugees we should be welcoming to the US and Europe.
And that guy just answered his own question.
White man can't jump, but he sure knows how to grow things!
We're too busy taking in beggars and gang members from Honduran or Guatemalan slums and calling them "Dreamers."
If we can agree that it isn't our responsibility to take the refugees already trying to get here, then why is it our job to take these?
No productive, hetero, skilled, anti Communists are allowed, especially if they're White.
Because someday we might have to flee to Russia ourselves …
Because most underlying motives for US immigration policy of the past 30 or more years have been to bring in future Dim voters, to bring in cheap labor, and to reduce the white percentag eof the US population. SA farmers would not advance any of those goals.
Trump might change that and even consider SA farmers for refugee status, but he'd meet a lot of resistance.
Because most underlying motives for US immigration policy of the past 30 or more years have been to bring in future Dim voters, to bring in cheap labor, and to reduce the white percentag eof the US population. SA farmers would not advance any of those goals.
Trump might change that and even consider SA farmers for refugee status, but he'd meet a lot of resistance.