Replies

[[improbability of genetic improvement by chance]]

It’s even worse than that- They claim NEW Non Species Specific genetic information is created by out of thin air- The only thing microevolution can do is work with material that is already present- it is incapable of creating new non species specific information out of thin air. A spider does not have the genetic information that a bat has- and never will because the information is does have is different than the bat’s

Mutations damage information- they don’t lead to new, non species specific information. They alter traits already present- but they can not create new non species specific information- Any information that does get altered does so because the information is already present and species specific- Macrovevolution demands that NEW non species specific information be created (ie a spider evolve echo location and wings in order to evolve into s bat [not that this is an evolution scenario- it’s just an argument to illustrate what would be needed IF it were claimed spiders evolved into bats])

Bacteria ‘evolving the ability to eat nylon’ (nylon, a recent man made material, being something that wasn’t around 1000’s of years ago) is still nothing more than micro evolution- The possibility is there because the bacteria contain species specific information that allows them to be able to digest nylon- turns out the bacteria had the ability right from the start, but the ability was subdued, not functioning, for a long time, and was kickstarted in the presence of an extreme environment where only nylon was available for fuel- Evolutionists loved to use this as an example of Macroevolution, claiming new non species specific information was created- Not true- They always had the Species specific coding for a protein called EEI which has the unique ability to digest small circular proteins- Nylon being modeled after these small circular proteins, but mutations destroyed enough information. that it made this ability dormant- non functioning - no new information was created- mutations simply reactivated information already available and species specific (ie other species do not have this information and never will)

So darwinists claim not just genetic improvement, but also claim NEW non species specific information is created by mutations- and nothing could be further from the truth- infact, species have several built in levels of protection to prevent non species specific information from taking over and destroying the species-