Skip to comments.
Ex-New York Chief Judge: It's time to end cash bail
Fox News ^
| Jonathan Limpan
Posted on 07/13/2018 10:43:56 AM PDT by re_tail20
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Graybeard58
10% of bail to be posted by the accused.
Is the rest just symbolic?
41
posted on
07/13/2018 12:00:20 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: re_tail20
42
posted on
07/13/2018 12:03:44 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
To: Midwesterner53
Exactly how I read it. You can almost read the racism in this article.
To: cuban leaf
The state takes the risk instead of the bondsman.... and the fees. Profitable business.
44
posted on
07/13/2018 12:07:47 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.)
To: dainbramaged
45
posted on
07/13/2018 12:13:03 PM PDT
by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
Good points. Non violent accused dont need to be in jail awaiting trial. I disagree, some lowlife transporting 100 pounds of fetnal or meth can kill thousands of people. It may be non-violent but just as deadly.
Aside from the Manfort case with is a disgrace I don't see why this is an issue.
46
posted on
07/13/2018 12:27:24 PM PDT
by
usurper
( version)
To: usurper
Well.i never thought of that. You are right, there’s potential for great injury if someone is transporting drugs like that.
Then it occurs to me, we really have to look at this case by case, to determine bail for suspects.
To: cuban leaf
It isn’t symbolic. If the accused fails to appear for trial, then the bond is forfeited and he owes the remaining 90%. He just owes it to the State rather than a bondsman.
To: 2banana
But how often does that really happen to the point bail can’t be raised?
49
posted on
07/13/2018 12:47:02 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: Still Thinking
I think on the contrary he is very well acquainted with common sense. Even more he is well acquainted with how the justice system is stacked against certain people. Many of them innocent of the charges or first time offenders accused of misdemeanors.
50
posted on
07/13/2018 12:49:13 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: jagusafr
He advocates for supervised release (barring valid concerns that the offender is a danger to others). So he is not suggesting a catch and release, where the heck did they go? alternative to cash bail.
51
posted on
07/13/2018 12:53:26 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: The Pack Knight
OK. Don't put yourself in a situation where it
appears that you broke the law.
I don't abide by what you're trying to say. I've told the story here before, but on the way to the wedding reception, the mother and father of the bride were hit and killed by a drunk driver, who happened to be an undocumented worker. The judge, for reasons no one can be certain said that, because he was not rich, bail would be set at $20,000, which he paid. No one has seen him since. To me, two murders that will never see justice because some stupid judge tried to take economic considerations into the bail judgement. People are jailed because of a flight risk, innocent or not. It's got little to do with guilt or innocence at that point in time.
52
posted on
07/13/2018 12:56:29 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: Mr.Unique
53
posted on
07/13/2018 1:08:52 PM PDT
by
dainbramaged
(My pit bull can solve quadratic equations but she doesn't brag about it.)
To: re_tail20
Just take their EBT cards.
Wanna eat? See da Judge.
54
posted on
07/13/2018 1:38:22 PM PDT
by
lightman
(Obama's legacy in 13 letters: BLM, ISIS, & ANTIFA. New axis of evil.)
To: dainbramaged
Heres an idea - dont commit any crimes and you wont be arrested. How many crimes have you committed today? The answer is, you don't know, because you have absolutely no idea ALL the things some federal, state, county, city law or regulatory action compels or forbids you to do. You cannot possibly know.
How many people have been arrested, put on trial, and then acquitted by a jury of their peers?
Not committing obvious acts of murder, rape and robbery certainly improves your likelihood of not being arrested, but it's no guarantee.
55
posted on
07/13/2018 1:48:57 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: econjack
undocumented worker Illegal alien. And I would have held him without bond.
56
posted on
07/13/2018 1:52:30 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: NorthMountain
See my post #53 in response to the other nit picker. I have committed no crimes today. It was a general statement.
57
posted on
07/13/2018 1:53:35 PM PDT
by
dainbramaged
(My pit bull can solve quadratic equations but she doesn't brag about it.)
To: re_tail20
So the judge never heard of bail bonds? Guess this is what is considered fake news!
58
posted on
07/13/2018 2:14:24 PM PDT
by
48th SPS Crusader
(I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
To: econjack
OK. Don't put yourself in a situation where it appears that you broke the law.
You have more trust in the government than I do. I tend to think it is a good thing that the Constitution protects the rights of the accused.
I don't abide by what you're trying to say. I've told the story here before, but on the way to the wedding reception, the mother and father of the bride were hit and killed by a drunk driver, who happened to be an undocumented worker. The judge, for reasons no one can be certain said that, because he was not rich, bail would be set at $20,000, which he paid. No one has seen him since. To me, two murders that will never see justice because some stupid judge tried to take economic considerations into the bail judgement. People are jailed because of a flight risk, innocent or not. It's got little to do with guilt or innocence at that point in time.
I am sorry to hear about what happened to that couple, but that is no reason to treat everyone accused of a crime as guilty. The judge is required to take the defendant's ability to pay into account when setting bail under the law of most states and federal law (if you are in federal court), though it sounds like he got in wrong in that case. Also, the Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail, and the purpose of bail is to secure the attendance of the accused, not to punish the accused or to set bail so high no one could post it.
That said, there is no general constitutional right to bail. In theory, I certainly wouldn't be opposed to a law denying bail for any illegal immigrant, though determining who is an illegal immigrant could be a problem.
To: dainbramaged
60
posted on
07/13/2018 4:25:19 PM PDT
by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson