Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This marine bacterium has the ability to digest nylon waste products, despite the fact that it doesn’t live in an environment that contains nylon waste products. (click for credit)

Article image and caption

1 posted on 07/13/2018 11:19:47 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

... or there was an earlier advanced civilization ... with or without the aliens.


2 posted on 07/13/2018 11:22:45 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

3 posted on 07/13/2018 11:24:31 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Evolution is a religion. This article would be heresy to the evolutionists.


6 posted on 07/13/2018 11:30:02 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Andromeda Strain had a bug that did something like that.
10 posted on 07/13/2018 11:38:02 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

“As with most evolutionary “facts,” this turned out to be nothing more than wishful thinking on the part of evolutionists. We now know that the genes needed for antibiotic resistance existed in the Middle Ages “

Utter nonsense. The genes were in the population at a low level and were selected for when the bacteria were exposed to antibiotics. They occurred as random mutations. Until antibiotics there was no advantage to the organisms that had them. That’s how evolution works.

So bacteria having a gene that degrades nylon is not surprising. Put them in an environment rich in nylon and you will see an increase in the number of bacteria with the gene.


15 posted on 07/13/2018 11:56:16 AM PDT by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Evolutionists have never said animals or bacteria create new genes in response to their environment. That’s Lysenkoism, not science.


18 posted on 07/13/2018 12:31:57 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

I worked for years on the discovery and study of microbes with the ability to biotransform man-made compounds like Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). We found that the pathways and enzymes able to degrade these compounds were those used to degrade natural compounds with a similar structure. In many cases there was no selective advantage to degrading the man-made compounds because the bacteria could not grow on these materials. While that meant it was not possible for them to increase their numbers in contaminated samples, we could increase their number by adding the natural compounds to the environmental samples.


21 posted on 07/13/2018 3:17:44 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson