Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith
reasonisfaith: "This is why we have the double blind aspect in research."

I think any good scientist would tell you they hope for the day when they discover a genuine, verified & confirmed anomaly -- not to their own pet theory, of course, but preferably to the theory of some old professor they particularly disliked in school.
Or maybe to the theory of a rival for the prettiest girl in class.
That's where true anomalies become not just challenging, but fun.

Point is, if you think of science as nothing more than self-protection or self-aggrandizement, well... it shouldn't be and in many, many cases is not.

49 posted on 07/17/2018 8:10:25 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

I’m merely pointing out that in the formation of human beliefs, passion always precedes intellect.

We believe what we want to be true, then we rationalize it. There is some room to get around this in the scientific method, such as with the double blind protocol. But one of our greatest weaknesses is the inclination to believe rational thinking is the rule.


51 posted on 07/18/2018 6:42:45 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson