As long as she didn’t mean to break any laws she should be fine. It’s the FBI standard, after all.
I read where Peter said he would accept that he changed the key phrase in describing Hillary’s action since the audit said it was done on his machine, but that he didn’t remember making the change. So that change was so inconsequential that he doesn’t remember it! Wouldn’t one of the other reviewers of the document asked him why he felt that change was warranted? Mr. Comey, for instance!