Good article
On point not mentioned is those very immigrants who came here and adopted American values also did not come here for welfare or to be taken care of
We can NOT afford to be taking care of all these illegals.
Interesting read.
There have been many threads on this site over the years, where people in some conservative area bemoan liberals from New York or California or other liberal places, changing the character of their localities.
In expanding into South Florida, the Midwestern-based chain experienced a higher level of "shrinkage" going into Cuban/Caribbean/South American communities.
We put a lot of focus on illegals and should but how many freepers know that we take in a million and a half immigrants every year, legally, most are Hispanic and most will vote democrat. The white birthrate in most states is no longer at replacement levels. At current rates of immigration in twenty years OR LESS the US will be a majority Hispanic and black country.
Now name for me how many Hispanic and black majority countries in the world are successful? Answer none
Our immigration policies, unless changed drastically, both legal and illegal, will be Americas undoing.
There is also another very good reason, maybe even more important--most immigrants vote for democrats. Enough immigrants put in here and the dems will have a california-like monopoly on power nearly countrywide and in nearly every state.
He further postulates that the DNC has gone so far left that their long range plan seems be to have the white voters become a minority through demographic shift and make it impossible for the Republicans to win an election again making the U.S. a one party country.
The DNC will be the winner in a socialist paradise ruled over by the DNC (Plantation Owner) or so they think. Apparently the DNC never heard of the French Revolution.
No sh$&t
The issue is really quite simple.
If we, the citizens of this country are the owners of the country, then we either successfully defend it from those who want to take it away or we lose it.
It’s not about rights, it’s about ownership. You only own that which you are willing and able to protect it by whatever means at your disposal.
We should be helping those less fortunate than ourselves - but what’s wrong with helping them in their countries rather than letting them into ours? Sending money there, however, doesn’t work because their corruptocrats steal it.
How about we go back to colonialism - can anybody really say that Africa, for example, is better off today that when the English and French ran it?.