Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K

I don’t believe the public would see a payment to a hooker as grounds to remove a sitting president, especially since we’re talking about a consensual event that took place over a decade ago.

Yes, it’s a violation of the law. No, I don’t see it as an infraction that would be impeachment worthy. Folks would laugh at that.

As for paying her, in return for her not telling the story, how would that be a campaign violation?

If Hillary hiring P.I.s to intimidate and silence women Bill Clinton had assaulted, raped, or beaten up wasn’t a problem, then it’s a laugh to think this would be for Trump.

Since this can’t be used to remove Trump, it’s only purpose would be to try and split up his marriage. The party that screams about what people to in their private lives should be their business, sure outs themselves here.

This is what I reference when I say that Melania Trump has put aside her personal feelings, to be the best First Lady she can be.

She is making it look like she has a good relationship with her husband. I hope she does. What I do know is that she could have made a big deal out of this publicly, but she opted to put it aside for the betterment of the nation.

What a class act.


85 posted on 07/20/2018 9:25:48 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Their entire goal is to divide Trump’s base and cost him and his party votes. They have been scorched Earth since the day he was elected. It has never abated one bit and it will actually get worse.

Sessions has opened up this whole drip drip thing for Mueller. I take back anything I ever said in defense of Sessions and admit I was wrong to trust that piece of shit.


99 posted on 07/20/2018 9:31:46 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
The party that screams about what people to in their private lives should be their business, sure outs themselves here.

Well, that party changes depending on who sits in the Oval Office. In the 90s it was the Democrat party that didn't care. Today it's the Republicans who don't care about philandering.

135 posted on 07/20/2018 9:45:10 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne; GOPJ; Cboldt
"You don’t want a criminal lawyer, you want a criminal lawyer."

Jesse Pinkman, Breaking Bad

140 posted on 07/20/2018 9:47:50 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Yes, it’s a violation of the law.

What law is violated? I'm not being belligerent - I just don't see any legal violation.

Unless the violation is the recording itself, perhaps - I'm not sure what NYS law says on the matter.

150 posted on 07/20/2018 9:54:29 AM PDT by MortMan (The white board is a remarkable invention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Playboy Bunny, not Hooker. Most men would admire/be jealous but admire his taste in fine looking women:-) Again I don’t really care about his personal life before he became president.


173 posted on 07/20/2018 10:20:30 AM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson