CLINTON FOUNDATION FINANCIAL FRAUDS (Enter Rosenstein, Mueller and Comey)

POLIZETTE ^ | 4/6/18 | Charles Ortel

[Liz]

A Clinton Foundation grant went to the Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund — but the latter group had only an office address in Washington, D.C. So what happened to the money? Here’s a question for which Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, special counsel Robert Mueller, and former FBI Director James Comey may well know the answer to — but aren’t likely to want to talk about in public, under oath:

Why did the Clinton Foundation send a $37 million grant for the Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund in 2010 to a Baltimore post office box when the CBHF told federal tax authorities that its only office that year was in Washington, D.C.?

For the rest of us, the answers to that and many other questions posed by those who wonder why investigations into obvious and rampant frauds involving Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton and their purported foundation never go anywhere are complex. But they’re worth following if you care about combating charitable fraud. Be prepared, because the answers also make clear that too many powerful people were and are covering up an odious set of scandals that implicate Establishment Republicans and Democrats alike.

Starting with Hillary’s first campaign to represent New York in the US Senate, Clinton allies were likely solicited for multiple purposes. As the internet evolved and as speeds increase communications involving the Foundation certainly occurred.

By November 2008, when Hillary and the Obama Transition Team negotiated their Memorandum of Understanding — itself a misleading and purposefully non-binding subterfuge — email traffic certainly dealt with incoming and outgoing Foundation financial flows and with the dire financial shape of the Foundation that is so evident looking here in Annual Reports for 2007 and 2008 that are intentionally garbled on the Clinton Foundation website.

It is worth noting that major donors to Clinton Foundation entities likely have retained extensive files that the FBI and other government authorities might obtain to flesh out the known record if all missing emails have, in fact, somehow disappeared.

Origins of the Clinton Foundation frauds. From Oct. 23, 1997, until Jan. 20, 2001, President Bill Clinton had the power to ensure that no prosecutions might move forward in the Department of Justice (DOJ) against the William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation, an entity that still has never bothered to file a mandatory federal income tax return for Oct. 23, 1997, through Dec. 31, 1997.

Though there is abundant evidence in the public domain of defective filings made under oath, across state lines, using the mails, Clinton likely felt secure that government officials, even in states controlled by Republicans, would never bring solicitation fraud prosecutions against his nascent “charity.”

Then, as it became clear that former Republican Texas Gov. George W. Bush would be inaugurated as his successor in the Oval Office, Clinton and others took steps to ensure that allies would occupy key roles inside the IRS, DOJ and elsewhere in the federal Establishment.

Enter Rosenstein, Mueller and Comey. According to his official biography, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein “from 2001 to 2005 … served as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Tax Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. He supervised the division’s criminal sections and coordinated the tax enforcement activities of the Tax Division, the U.S. attorney’s offices and the Internal Revenue Service.”

Records available through the FBI vault confirm that the FBI and DOJ attorneys conducted investigations, empaneled grand juries, and issued subpoenas, yet they were unable to bring indictments or gain convictions against the many individuals and entities linked to the Clinton charity, which clearly engaged in a raft of frauds, across state lines, and in numerous nations.

These FBI records, many of which are heavily redacted even now, clearly show that former FBI Director James Comey played “leadership” roles in these epic failures and that Comey’s predecessor as FBI chief, Robert Mueller, was personally aware of the course of these ineffective efforts after he assumed his duties in September 2001.

To see how badly Rosenstein, Mueller and Comey flubbed the Clinton Foundation "investigation," visit the organization's website and try to find audits for 1998 through 2004. You will not find them there, but you will find non-compliant accounting work product for 2000 through 2004 here, here, here, and here. You will never notice charity fraud when you refuse to look at key evidence including fake audits that ineffectively mask the brazen theft of at least $64 million.

Recent years that matter: 2009 forward. The Clinton Foundation filed an amended federal tax return for 2010 on Nov. 16, 2015. The largest single expense declared for 2010 is a grant of more than $37 million to the CBHF at a post office box in Baltimore, Maryland.

This recent — within the statute of limitations — declaration on page 36 of the amended return is boldly incorrect. Sworn declarations made using the U.S. mails across state lines to New York and Minnesota declared that the only office and mailing address that CBHF had during the year in question was in Washington, D.C. So why was the $37 million sent to a Baltimore post office address? Who retrieved the check from the P.O. box? What happened to the $37 million thereafter?

Moreover, it is mathematically impossible to reconcile declarations made in these key states to regulators that are public records with federal tax filings for CBHF. Here's why: In total, CBHF declared nearly $49 million in grants and contributions for the entire year 2010. In a CBHF state filing received in New York on June 29, 2010, Anita Bhatt, the fund's chief financial officer, declared: "Because the [CBHF] did not receive its 501(c)(3) status until April 2010, the Clinton Foundation and the Communities Foundation of Texas solicited funds on behalf of CBHF at the request of former President George W. Bush."

In a filing received July 21, 2010, Bhatt declared that contributions and grants through May 31, 2010, totaled $34.1 million, reiterated that she was in charge of CBHF funds and repeated that CBHF had only one office in Washington, D.C.

This means that if the Clinton Foundation actually sent more than $37 million to a Baltimore address, it must have done so after May 31, 2010, which would mean that CBHF collected more than $71 million during a year when it ultimately declared just under $49 million in total revenues.

Claims by the Clinton Foundation concerning its supposed grant to CBHF do not and cannot be squared with CBHF filings. Someone here is lying and many people are doing their best to cover up what looks like a crystal-clear instance of charity fraud and other serious crimes.

How much money did the Clinton Foundation actually receive during 2010, while soliciting to help poor Haitians after their devastating earthquake? More important, where did the money raised for Haiti by Clinton, Bush, and their associates actually go? And remember, 2010 was a key election year, with much at stake for Democrats.

The same accounting firm — BKD LLP — that rendered opinions to the Clinton Foundation during its early years continued as its auditor during and after 2010. We certainly will never know the answer to that question if we must rely on Rosenstein, Mueller and Comey, who, it must be remembered, were failing to catch obvious frauds during those early years.

And one more thing: The same accounting firm — BKD LLP — that rendered opinions to the Clinton Foundation during its early years continued as its auditor during and after 2010.

President Donald Trump has been too patient with too many powerful swamp creatures. Americans deserve a real, empowered investigation into Clinton charity and allied frauds, and it should be convened as soon as possible. Charles Ortel, a retired investment banker, concentrates on exposing complex frauds in his new career as an investigator, writer and commentator

Related Link: Family’s Illegal Control of Clinton Charity Violates Multiple State Laws, Regs

[DaveA37]

If the U.S. had a Attorney General, where is the “Special Council” to investigate that massive fraud by the Clinton Foundation. Sending millions of dollars to a P.O. Box has a lot of explaining and a group of HONEST lawyers (is there such a thing?) might, repeat might come up with the answers plus several subpoenas.

[ptsal]

several YouTube videos posted on Crowd Source the Truth
search Charles Ortel and Jason Goodman

Very good material and well sourced.
You can go read the original research and make an informed decision.

[UCANSEE2]

Here is how it works. You send a check to a PO box for $XX million.

You call it a donation and take credit for it on your tax filings.

One of your cronies pick up the check and destroys it.

No taxes paid on it, and it never left your account.

Pretty neat, huh ?

[Vendome]

Whatever.

Nothing will ever be done to Clinton Mafia....

[Sergio]

bkmk

[Heart of Georgia]

It Takes a Cabal

[proust]

have they all given each other immunity yet?

[Harpotoo]

All those words about people that immune to prosecution. Meh.

[libstripper]

“I am curious as to what George W Bush thinks about this or knows about this. Has he asked Bill & Hillary what happened to the money? His name seems to be tied in to the basis of fundraising.”

He’s so far into it that the Clinton and Bush foundations were sharing the same web page. For many years the Bushes have run the Clintons’ ethical laundry.

[TexasGator]

How much did he make off his book?

[LouisianaJoanof Arc]

Bookmark. Very Important!!!

[libstripper]

$37 million to a post office box?????

Please, poor little Chelsea needed some place to get the $11,000,000 for her NYC condo and the innocent child was only making about $500,000 a year, mere pauper’s wages. Bless her little heart.

[Liz]

Origins of the Clinton Foundation frauds. From Oct. 23, 1997 to Jan. 20, 2001, then-President Bill Clinton had the power to ensure that no DOJ prosecutions might move forward against the William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation, an entity that still has never bothered to file a mandatory federal income tax return for Oct. 23, 1997, through Dec. 31, 1997. Though there is abundant evidence in the public domain of defective Foundation filings made under oath, across state lines, using the mails, Clinton likely felt secure that government officials, even in states controlled by Republicans, would never bring solicitation fraud prosecutions against his nascent “charity.”

=======================================

Also useful to know----when Clinton setup the Foundation in Arkansas as a non-profit, it was strictly a fund-raiser for his library. He was NEVER authorized as a non-profit for his global fund-raising activities.

more on the latter below

[Liz]

The $400 million Putin mentioned could have easily been laundered thru the Clintons vast money machine.

There’s the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Family Foundation, and its international arm, the Clinton Global Initiative....

In addition to the Clinton Global Initiative, and the Clinton Foundation, there are separate
Clinton family foundations, entities that maintain their own revenue streams. All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons’ pay-to-play global racketeering operations:

<><>the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI),

<><>the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation,

<><>the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong,

<><> William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya),

<><>William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK),

<><> the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden).

<><> Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada.

The Arkansas-based Clinton Library also raises huge amounts of money from Muslim Mideast sources and other entities.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

$37 million to a post office box?????

Seriously.

[Liz]

ITEM <><>The Dallas office of the IRS's investigation into Clinton Foundation public filings found missing disclosures concerning Clinton Foundation donations from foreign governments

ITEM <><> Other glaring discrepancies should have triggered payment of substantial fines, penalties, and interest to government treasuries long ago.

================================

nypost.com

Then-NYAG Eric Schneiderman Let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors
By Bob Fredericks September 6, 2016 | 9:37pm

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

Scripps News found that the foundation and its subsidiary, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, took in $225 million in government donations between 2010 and 2014. New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.” But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.

On its website, the Clinton Foundation reveals its foreign donors, but using only broad ranges, such as $5 million to $10 million, without any time frames. The IRS doesn’t require such disclosures.In 2009, Clinton’s first year at the State Department, the foundation disclosed a lump sum of $122 million in foreign-government donations in its New York paperwork, posting the total amount on a form that requires all charities to “list each government contribution separately.”

Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin said, “This is a ridiculous accusation. The Clinton Foundation goes above and beyond the disclosure requirements by listing every donor on their website and updating the list quarterly.” Schneiderman’s office said, “The Clinton Foundation’s disclosures regarding funding from foreign governments are in compliance with New York law.”

Other charities complied, including the George W. Bush foundation, which reported receiving $5 million from Saudi Arabia and $500,000 from Kuwait.

Hillary and the smirking Eric Schneiderman (right).
E/S was recently ousted from office after charges he spat at,
choked and slapped women he was intimate with.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Liz.

[enumerated]

“Perot was willing to spend mucho dinero to swing the election for Clinton, not just once but twice.”

Bush Sr pissed off the establishment big time when he assigned Dan Quayle to solve skyrocketing health care costs.

Quayle immediately identified the correct culprit: malpractice lawsuits and the need for tort reform. Overnight, every ambulance chasing lawyer, the pharmacuetical lobby, the AMA, the Heath insurance lobby and 3/4 of congress turned from life long Republican supporters to Democrat supporters.

Malpractice had become a government subsidized protection racket that was lining the pockets of doctors, lawyers, big pharm, hospitals, politicians, etc., etc., who could justify layer upon layer of costly and redundant testing, treatment, and capital inrastructure in the name of patient safety, and medical provider risk reduction.

It’s true that Ross Perot’s third party run tipped the election both times - but I’ve always been skeptical about claims that he spent his own money - he could have been reimbursed under the table and there were a lot of powerful lobbies that wanted the Healthcare finger pointed elsewhere.

These powerful lobbies wanted healthcare nationalized and when Bush/Quayle failed to play along, Clinton was groomed as the Manchurian candidate to further that agenda. Bush Jr. was a setback but Obama was supposed to put them back on track.

Obamacare was such a predictable disaster and the election of Trump pretty much snuffed out their hopes.

I think the “deep state” is in tatters - as evil as they come, but leaderless and desperate. Trump may have a far better chance of draining the swamp than even his supporters think. It may not take the form of Democrats being locked up, but it may be happening through attrition and by being starved out. The corrupt lobbyists, bureaucrats and legislators are still there but the flow of money stopped in its tracks when Trump began deregulating.

[jjotto]

Recall that Ross Perot actually made his fortune processing Medicare claims.

[b4its2late]

Ahhhhhhhhh.