Skip to comments.
Tucker Carlson: Robert Mueller Seeking Immunity for Tony Podesta to Testify Against Paul Manafort
The Conservative Treehouse ^
| July 19, 2018
| sundance
Posted on 07/20/2018 12:58:11 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: Peeps47
I think he can pardon him. The question would be not what is legal, but whether it would have political consequence.
41
posted on
07/20/2018 2:12:16 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Brian Griffin
Manafort’s charges has NOTHING to do with Trump.
To: Peeps47
And remember, they are still after Cohen too.
This is retaliatory responding to the exposure of the widespread FBI/DOJ collusion against Trump. Strzok and Page revelations.
43
posted on
07/20/2018 2:15:10 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Responsibility2nd
Sure it is fake...smh
For those who say trust Sessions, trust the process, trust Mueller, I say no. I trust no one but Trump and his spokesman at this point. Not his cabinet, not his Veep, nor even his advisors or appointees. Treason is afoot, and it has infested all to some manner or other. I would pardon Flynn, and appoint him to the highest position he could be in without approval of others, and let him take a FLAMETHROWER to the place.
44
posted on
07/20/2018 2:44:22 PM PDT
by
Glad2bnuts
(If Republicans are not prepared to carry on the Revolution of 1776, prepare for a communist takeover)
To: Texas Fossil
What does this have to do with the Russians interfering with the 2016 election? I’m just sayin’
To: butlerweave
hell !! mueller is the leader of this country, sessions is his lackey..
46
posted on
07/20/2018 2:52:07 PM PDT
by
my right
To: arthurus
I dont see how granting immunity makes it okay to compel testimony. Immunity makes it OK to compose testimony... for the immunized party.
47
posted on
07/20/2018 2:54:25 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600><p>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
To: Texas Fossil
what crimes is he getting immunity from?
48
posted on
07/20/2018 3:38:38 PM PDT
by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
To: Chode
Being an un-registered foreign agent. Plus whatever else the want to make up on the fly.
49
posted on
07/20/2018 3:47:23 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Texas Fossil
Someone please explain, in terms that make sense, just how “offering immunity” is different from bribing a witness when that witness is at risk for great financial loss?
50
posted on
07/20/2018 6:15:49 PM PDT
by
motor_racer
(If you don't read the news, you are uninformed. If you read the news, you are misinformed.)
To: motor_racer
I have no explanation of why they are different.
In this application? I’d say they are the same. But it is the prosecutor doing the deal, not a defendant to a witness.
51
posted on
07/20/2018 7:24:58 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: Texas Fossil
it is my impression that crimes must be listed chapter and verse for what the immunity is for before it is even offered
52
posted on
07/21/2018 9:34:39 AM PDT
by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
To: elcid1970
No - the same rules apply. What are you thinking is different than in other cases?
53
posted on
07/22/2018 10:14:52 AM PDT
by
sipow
To: timestax
54
posted on
07/22/2018 11:32:13 AM PDT
by
timestax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson