Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: CARTER PAGE FISA RELEASE
NYT ^ | 7/21/2018 | F-I/D-J

Posted on 07/21/2018 3:33:51 PM PDT by Steven W.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has disclosed a previously top-secret set of documents related to the wiretapping of Carter Page, the onetime Trump campaign adviser who was at the center of highly contentious accusations by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that the F.B.I. had abused its surveillance powers.

[Read the documents here.]

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stfisaapplication; 201610; 2ndfisaapplication; 3rdfisaapplication; 4thfisaapplication; annconway; billpriestap; boente; braking; carterpage; carterpagefisa; collyer; comey; danaboente; davidlaufman; dearle; doj; fbi; fisa; fisaabuse; jamescomey; johnbrennan; lisapage; page; peterstrzok; redactions; robertmueller; rosemarycollyer; trump; trumprussia; trumpwiretaps; wiretap; wiretapping; yates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-225 next last
To: Paladin2
Yes and it makes you wonder why Page has never really expressed any outrage about what happened to him. Or why he never hired a lawyer. IMO Page was working with the FBI to infiltrate the Trump campaign. How else can you explain his actions and reaction to what was done to him? His playing a naive, buffoon does not comport with his resume.

The warrant goes into some detail on the Buryakov case starting on page 13. It is also interesting how they describe Source #1 (Steele) and the way they fudged who paid for the ops research claiming it was a law firm and not mentioning the DNC or Hillary.

The Nunes report did a good job of describing what was in the FISA application. It is worth reading the application itself to see how the FBI with the assistance of the DNI and CIA lied and by omission, created a trumped up document to spy on the Trump campaign and transposition teams, as well as a sitting President. The redactions need to be removed to get the full picture. Trump should order it.

61 posted on 07/21/2018 4:30:32 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
The second FISA was signed off by Michael Mosman and the third by Anne Conway
62 posted on 07/21/2018 4:30:37 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Even in the few pages which aren’t blacked out you can see that Candidate #1=Trump was there real target in the FISA application.


63 posted on 07/21/2018 4:32:37 PM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Remember, it’s Trump who released it and Trump who redacted it. Keeps the water chummed.


64 posted on 07/21/2018 4:32:40 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

White House CYA


65 posted on 07/21/2018 4:32:57 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Judicial Watch was one of the parties along with the NYT that filed the FOIA request. You can bet Tom Fitton (JW) will produce a detailed evaluation of the data provided.


66 posted on 07/21/2018 4:33:21 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Rosenstein should be recused.

Now in FBI Vault: https://vault.fbi.gov/d1-release/d1-release/view


67 posted on 07/21/2018 4:37:31 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It is highly likely Page was employed by, or working with, the CIA/FBI when he opened up his own business 10 years ago.


68 posted on 07/21/2018 4:41:23 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Ridiculous reactions.


69 posted on 07/21/2018 4:41:38 PM PDT by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

I read through most of what was there. Basically, the FBI claiming to the court that Carter Page was an agent of Russia and acted illegally because Christopher Steele said he secretly met with a Putin ally in Moscow and then news reports said that he tried to change the Republican Party platform to make it softer on Russia. Unless there are bombshells underneath the redactions, it’s just as we’ve all though: the whole Russia collusion hoax is based on complete crap, at best an attempt to transform a policy debate into an espionage/criminal issue, and at worst, just an attempt to use the national security state to find dirt on Trump. There ought to be long prison sentences if not firing squads for everyone who put their name on this document.


70 posted on 07/21/2018 4:42:25 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

71 posted on 07/21/2018 4:44:49 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouisianaJoanof Arc

The date redactions are going to be important info.


72 posted on 07/21/2018 4:46:10 PM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (#POTUS#Stable#Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dead

Looking for my decoder.


73 posted on 07/21/2018 4:46:41 PM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (#POTUS#Stable#Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
Just a quick skim got me this. And nothing of real substance other than this.

"There has been speculation in the U.S. media that the Russian Government was behind the hack."

and…

"during a recent interview with an identified news organization..."

That's just based on a preliminary skim. Looks like this may be as we have been told. Hillary and the deepies planted stories in the media then used those stories as the basis for this warrant.

AND THE JUDGE WENT FOR IT.

Amazing.

Bagster


74 posted on 07/21/2018 4:48:18 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

I guarantee the most relevant fact is NOT in this document. Namely, Carter Page was an FBI informant.

They planted their guy in the campaign and then fraudulently obtained a FISA warrant so they could “legally” wiretap everyone Page talked to.

I just want to see it admitted and dealt with.


75 posted on 07/21/2018 4:51:18 PM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Time for the president to unredact it.


76 posted on 07/21/2018 4:52:04 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

if you read the initial application, it absolutely conceals any links to the Clinton campaign. The initial application is all Steele Dossier. There is no other evidence against Page.

Says Source #1 (Steele) is working for US Person #1 (Simpson) who is working to discredit the campaign of Candidate #1 (Trump).

Only in later applications for the renewal is the connection to the Clinton campaign revealed.

No wonder Democrats didn’t want this made public !


77 posted on 07/21/2018 4:52:34 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (Liberals are filled with fury because their time is short.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

As I read it the first and second submissions were for 90 days. The third for sixty days. The fourth once again for 90 days. Why the sixty days?


78 posted on 07/21/2018 4:52:54 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

“Whole lotta black, but a case for Page being an agent of Russia.”

Funny that since Carter Page had worked for the FBI not much earlier.

Only in the US, can UK intelligence obtain Kremlin intel about an American citizen paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and be issued a warrant for massive spying on him and those two clicks away.

Those two clicks mean everyone on the Trump campaign.


79 posted on 07/21/2018 4:54:24 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Nope. This one was from a Judicial Watch suit.

DOJ had control of redactions


80 posted on 07/21/2018 4:55:06 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson