Byron York’s response to fifth paragraph in his Washington Examiner piece - FISA warrant application supports Nunes memo - states:
Democrats argue that the FISA Court judges should have been able to figure out, from that obscure description, that the DNC and Clinton campaign paid for the dossier. That seems a pretty weak argument, but in any case, the Nunes memo’s statement that the FISA application did not disclose or reference the role of the DNC and the Clinton campaign is undeniably true...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fisa-warrant-application-supports-nunes-memo
if Dems are really arguing such nonsense, it would be worse, because that would prove the FISA judges KNEW they were approving a warrant based on Clinton/DNC unverified “evidence”. if I were them, I would not push this angle, even though I believe the FISA judges did know. lol.
I really need to read to the the end of the thread...
good job
Didn’t Judge Contreras sign off on the FISA...and Judge Contreras had a party thrown for him by STRZOK!!