Posted on 07/25/2018 4:19:35 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
CNN is, predictably, in wall-to-wall coverage this morning of the tape of a conversation between then-candidate Trump and Michael Cohen that Cohen’s lawyer Lanny Davis has provided to the network.
But amidst all the fevered speculation about what was said on the tape and what the legal and political ramifications might be, CNN political analyst David Gregory did offer this reality check on Cohen:
“This is pretty seedy on his part, as a lawyer, to record his client. And I think the President will have a constituency saying: who is this guy and why did he do that?”
Get the rest of the story and view the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblogger.com ...
Cohen should be disbarred for this
___________________________
Does this mean that the powers that be at the ABA are also corrupt?
Isn’t anything sacred?
Do you want a snake that goes public with your meetings?
A snake that shows his hand to the Ex?
A snake who plays both sides? I suspect you want a snake that has standards.
I said a little bit snake, not full on snake.
I was just trying to explain why someone would hire one.
I didn't know David Gregory was still breathing...He sure drifted off the cliff some time ago...guess CNN is getting desperate for guest speakers to come to their TURD RATED network...
I just saw a pig fly past my window was wondering why. Now I know.
I have some good news and some bad news. Good news a bus full of lawyers drove off a cliff. Bad news, one seat was empty.
Michael Cohen’s a liberal democrat, right? I’ll bet money on it.
The ABA is also corrupt.
I contacted them once to file a complaint against an attorney.
I listed 6 things that he did wrong.
The ass hole on the phone said “OK write us a letter stating item #1 and #3...”
SO I did, assuming those were the most important things, and I got a letter back saying “I’m sorry but we don’t take any action for those types of claims”
Faqrgin bastiges...
Then I wrote a letter claiming the OTHER 4 items, and they wrote back saying I was inventing new things since the first claim did not mention any of this...
THIS IS WHY PEOPLE HATE ALL LAWYERS. It is the 99% of sleazy ones that give a bad name to all the rest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.