Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww

The block / scan system of the same type used for tests seems good. It has a paper backup that can be counted.


2 posted on 07/26/2018 7:17:00 AM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: \/\/ayne

What ever system is used, it should be simple. In Cuyahoga County, the system is so laden with safeguards that something almost has to go wrong. Add to that absentee voting, early voting at county headquarters, multiple ID options....all in the name of fairness. I worked the polls a for second time in May. Keeping it all smoothly running and comprehensible has become impossible. It had definitely gotten more layers of activity since a year and a half ago, every layer to address some perceived problem.


6 posted on 07/26/2018 7:22:49 AM PDT by grania (President Trump, stop believing the Masters of War!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: \/\/ayne
The block / scan system of the same type used for tests seems good. It has a paper backup that can be counted.

^ This.

Optically-scanned ballots easily and cheaply scale up or down depending on anticipated turnout, unlike voting kiosks.

There is an audit trail of the original paper ballot filled out by the voter, unlike voting kiosks.

You still get electronic tabulation of votes for faster election night results, like voting kiosks.

The investment in equipment, training, and maintenance is much lower with optically scanned ballots, unlike voting kiosks.

Touch screen voting kiosks should not only no longer be purchased or funded by the federal government, they should be banned from any future use in federal elections.

12 posted on 07/26/2018 7:28:27 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: \/\/ayne
The block / scan system of the same type used for tests seems good. It has a paper backup that can be counted.

I agree. The old "ScanTron" method was good enough for our education system for years. It gave us a fighting chance if a machine misread an answer that was changed or a smear.

I would be on board with electronic voting if the machine provided a paper receipt of the vote. It doesn't even have to be personalized, just a piece of paper that shows the vote as tallied by the machine.

17 posted on 07/26/2018 7:34:27 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: \/\/ayne

The current system has so many ways to cheat that it’s unbelievable. Here in California we have Motor Voter where non citizens can register to vote when they get their driver’s licenses. An illegal is not “officially” allowed to register, but it’s so easy to “mistakenly” register, and no one ever checks.

That’s another thing, check the voter rolls and update them! No dead people voting, no felons, no illegals, no dogs (sorry), and no voting in two states.


31 posted on 07/26/2018 8:17:09 AM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson