Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GuavaCheesePuff

Well, he’s been in there for a while, so it’s not shocking that the voters might want a change. That said, I’ve pointed out the Democrats are highly motivated and have flipped nearly 50 seats if you count state and local. Add to that Trump is polling poorly in Wisconsin right now as well as several other swing states. The fall is going to be brutal. Swing voters baffle me to some extent because how can you be for secure borders in one election and open in another (for example)?


10 posted on 07/26/2018 4:31:22 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pinkbell

“Swing voters baffle me to some extent because how can you be for secure borders in one election and open in another (for example)?”

I’ve noticed many people are single issue voters. They will take an issue other than borders and consider it to be most important. For example, I know of one voter that’s upset with Trumps veterans policy, and want a change. She’s not looking at the big picture, where if a Hitlery gets in, the VA will actually get worse as it did with obama.


71 posted on 07/26/2018 5:48:49 PM PDT by redfreedom (Gun control has proven success! (Such as in Hitler's Germany & Stalin's Russia))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

OK, name the 50 seats that have been flipped and how many are state/local vs. federal? Gird up, man, oh ye of little faith...this fall is going to be splendid...we keep the House and gain in the Senate. The question is what are YOU doing to ensure this instead of clutching pearls? And what the hell are you talking about swing voters being for secure voters in one election and open in another? Me thinks you’re watching waaaaaayyyyyy too much CNN.


98 posted on 07/26/2018 7:37:10 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

It’s July. Virtually no one except pussy-hat-wearing Ds are paying attention. And it’s an “adults” poll of states that don’t even do registration by party. That said, here is what I’ve learned in the last week in some critical House races (and no, I don’t buy that the “50” flipped seats mean anything-—many of those are very low level state house seats in races literally, and I mean literally, with 8% turnout.) The ONLY special the Ds won was the “massive” 500 point victory by Conor Lamb.

Anyway:
*My source “OhioWan” in Ohio, who has been dead on (perhaps even a tad low for Rs) says flat out “No Republican House member is in trouble in OH.” He says Chabot will win and Balderson in CD12 will hold Tiberie’s seat. Moreover, he says that they have Renacci at about -5 or -6, but that Renacci’s name recognition is a mere 34% (Brown’s is 90) and Renacci has a lot of money. They are confident that he will roll out a crapload of ads and by October be in a dead heat.

Remember, “unaffiliated” voters in OH can be either D or R. They are “unaffiliated” because they didn’t vote in the last primary so they are hard to pin down. We did it in 2016, and were very accurate at determining they were breaking hard for Trump, by going back four election cycles PER HOUSEHOLD. No one else did this kind of detailed work. Even then, we were still low!

*In AZ, I asked a very high source about the McSally seat, which is open and which Sabato has as a “tossup.” “We will win that seat” came the unequivocal reply.

*Recent polling in CA 49 shows the R up 3 (Issa only won by 1). In WA, Reichert’s seat, Dino Rossi raised a ton of money and will be very competitive to hold that. There are two seats in MN that the MN GOP think they can win.

Now, as to the generic ballot: today a poll came out showing D+4. Richard Baris thinks that’s the high end for the Ds, that in fact it may be much lower. But THEY NEED A GENERIC OF FIVE TO HAVE A HOPE OF WINNING THE HOUSE.

Baris tells me that all the pollsters are still off in understanding “likely voters” and that his model is now refined so that it is 60% more accurate than theirs. He thinks the House as of now is even in terms of polling and that all that remains is enthusiasm.

So what about enthusiasm? Debbie Lesko’s AZ special showed heavy turnout here; TX has had massive R turnout (which is why neither of the two TX House seats Sabato claims are “tossups” are. Both are solid R. TX people tell me that no R will lose in TX.

In short, losing a few minor state house seats in 2016 wasn’t a predictor of anything. I still think the GOP hasn’t even begun to galvanize for fall, and when it does, we still could very well see the House Rs GAIN a few seats. As of today, I have 27 seats competitive. Ds have to win 60% of those to take the House. If Rs turn just 3-4 of those, game over.


99 posted on 07/26/2018 7:37:56 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson