If you can afford to buy cigarettes, TAXPAYERS don't need to subsidize your housing. DUH
1 posted on
07/31/2018 3:00:59 PM PDT by
Drango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Drango
Bet you can smoke pot, huh? Ridiculous
2 posted on
07/31/2018 3:01:59 PM PDT by
laweeks
To: Drango
and the new rule wipes out smoking in more than 940,000 other units. SWEEEEEET.
3 posted on
07/31/2018 3:02:38 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Drango
Does it cover marijuana???
To: Drango
Ben Carson has a fire extinguisher as big government continues to rule. What is being done to get people out of public housing? Is there a correlation to jobs. Let’s hear that report.
6 posted on
07/31/2018 3:04:40 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
(Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: Drango
This will be the LEAST ENFORCED law EVAH!
8 posted on
07/31/2018 3:04:59 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
To: Drango
That doesn’t include crack, because that would be discriminatory.
9 posted on
07/31/2018 3:06:25 PM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: Drango
10 posted on
07/31/2018 3:06:26 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it)
To: Drango
Good luck enforcing it. They can’t even stop drug dealing in these places.
11 posted on
07/31/2018 3:06:45 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Drango
Take the King’s coin, live by the King’s rules.
12 posted on
07/31/2018 3:07:25 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The New York Times is so openly dishonest, even their crossword puzzles lie.)
To: Drango
The ban is expected to save government housing agencies $153 million a year in repairs and health care costs Not necessarily...
To: Drango
Now THIS is funny!!!
I can’t wait to see the leftists who blame Whitey on blacks smoking and the leftists who think all smokers should be shot on sight go after each other on this one.
Waiting for the first eviction.
(/popcorn).
14 posted on
07/31/2018 3:07:37 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Trump is such a liar. He said we'd be tired from all this winning" (/dfwgator 7/27/18))
To: Drango
This will be fun to watch over the next year or so. Short arson insurance companies and buy home renovation companies’ stock.
15 posted on
07/31/2018 3:09:01 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: Drango
LOL. Only a fool would pass this regulation.
Not that I don't approve. But let the 9th Circuit enforce it.
OK Leroy, drop the Newports, and back away slowly!
16 posted on
07/31/2018 3:09:34 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
To: Drango
If you can afford to buy cigarettes, TAXPAYERS don't need to subsidize your housing. DUH Du'ohhhhh......
19 posted on
07/31/2018 3:12:41 PM PDT by
Ron H.
To: Drango
Yes, if if you don’t want the government to be you master, don’t use a government program.
On the other hand, as much as I realize smoking is bad, and people, for their own health, should not do it, and with the taxes so high on it it is very expensive, I still believe that HUD’s ban - promulgated by Obama’s admin - should have been limited to common and public areas of public housing, and not the housing/apartments.
Why? It is not illegal to smoke, and therefor, in spite of the government supported nature of the housing, how can the government totally ban something that is not illegal. Again, though not a smoker and not supporting smoking, I think those affected should take HUD to court.
As to private housing and private property, that is another matter and private property owners can ban activities, even if they are legal. But the government is everyone’s government, non-smokers and smokers alike, and it should not be discriminating between the two.
22 posted on
07/31/2018 3:14:19 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: Drango
So did Congress vote on this? (I know they didn't.) How many unelected bureaucrats in DC decided this?
[FTR I smoke cigars, but never cigarettes.]
ML/NJ
25 posted on
07/31/2018 3:16:20 PM PDT by
ml/nj
(.)
To: Drango
Tobacco is expensive because of government!
26 posted on
07/31/2018 3:17:31 PM PDT by
tallyhoe
To: Drango
28 posted on
07/31/2018 3:21:26 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: Drango
“The ban does not apply to e-cigarettes, snuff and chewing tobacco”
Oops, they better go back and fix the loophole.
29 posted on
07/31/2018 3:21:28 PM PDT by
dgbrown
To: Drango
Yes, and it will be so easily enforced....
31 posted on
07/31/2018 3:25:27 PM PDT by
PGR88
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
