To: jazusamo
In May, the state slapped $1 million-plus fines on insurance companies Lockton Cos. and Chubb Ltd., saying they violated state law by marketing and underwriting Carry Guard policies and that the policy improperly provided coverage for criminal proceedings arising from the use of a gun. Is legal-defense insurance a constitutional thing to ban?
3 posted on
08/07/2018 7:20:51 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
I personally don’t see how it ‘s constitutional for a state to to deny a right that’s legal but I’m no lawyer.
8 posted on
08/07/2018 7:26:52 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: HiTech RedNeck
...Is legal-defense insurance a constitutional thing to ban?...
Obama, Hilary, Cuomo, Schumer and the rest of the democrats don’t need a stinkin’ Constitution.
21 posted on
08/07/2018 7:50:00 AM PDT by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
To: HiTech RedNeck
It’s just like liberals to want to force gun owners to carry liability insurance and then outlaw it.
35 posted on
08/07/2018 10:23:00 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The ONLY purpose for gun control is so that one group can force its will on a less powerful group.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson