Posted on 08/07/2018 12:31:00 PM PDT by Red Badger
he Left is abusing American high school education in its struggle to gain and retain political power. We only found out about this incident by accident. How many more?
Shortly after President Trumps inauguration, a group of public school history teachers in the posh Boston suburb of Newton pledged to reject the call for objectivity in the classroom, bully conservative students for their beliefs, and serve as liberal propagandist[s] for the cause of social justice.
This informal pact was made in an exchange of emails among history teachers at Newton North High School, part of a very rich but academically mediocre public school district with an annual budget of $200 million, a median home price of almost half a million, and a median household income of more than $120,000. Read the entire email exchange here.
I obtained the emails under a Massachusetts public records law after one of those teachers arranged, earlier this year, for an anti-Semitic and anti-Israel organization to show Palestinian propaganda films at Newton North. This stunt earned the Newton Public Schools district a rebuke from the New England branch of the Anti-Defamation League and from Bostons Jewish Community Relations Council. But, as the teachers emails reveal, Jew-hatred is not the only specter haunting the history department at Newton North. The Teachers Conspire to Hide Extreme Prejudice
It was late on a cold and snowy New England evening in February 2017, and Newton North history teacher Isongesit Ibokette was venting at his keyboard about the new guidelines for avoiding bias in teaching. They had been sent out by Newton Norths principal that morning, prompted by the general ill will among teachers for the new occupant of the White House.
The guidelines asked teachers to remain objective while teaching about historical and current events; and to treat all students, regardless of political opinion, with respect. Teachers were told: For current controversial issues (health care, immigration, environmental policies, gun laws), teach students that there are different perspectives and present the reasoning of those who hold those different perspectives.
Ibokette was having none of it. He typed this reply: I am concerned that the call for objectivity may just inadvertently become the most effective destructive weapon against social justice, and sent it to the members of Newton Norths history department.
Ibokette was responding to an email from another Newton North history teacher, David Bedar. Bedar was same teacher who hosted the anti-Semites at Newton North, and has played a significant role in the years-long controversy over anti-Jewish bias in the public schools of the heavily Jewish suburb.
Earlier that February day, Bedar sent an email to fellow Newton North history faculty, accusing President Trump and his supporters of nativism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc., and objecting to the following donts that the Newton North principal had asked teachers to avoid:
Assume that all students agree with us. . . . Assume that all students feel comfortable disagreeing with us. . . . Present facts or logic that support only one side of a current controversial issue. . . . Present our own personal opinion on a current controversial issue as more right than another viewpoint. . . .
These guidelines seem like Pedagogy 101, and are foundational to correctly applying logic and reason. Yet Bedar, who holds a masters in teaching from the prestigious Duke University, admitted to his colleagues:
Personally, Im finding it really difficult in the current climate to teach kids to appreciate other perspectives. . . [T]he other viewpoint might not really be an argument about which reasonable people can disagree and might not lead to any kind of intellectual, policy debate; it might just be blatantly racist. . . . [I]t feels wrong to not call out ideas that I know will offend many of my students and create a hostile and potentially unsafe environment. . . . Im worried that as a school were so focused on making all kids feel safe and being PC that were not showing enough concern for [immigrant] students whose very rights to attend this school and receive an education are being seriously threatened. . . . I dont feel good about protecting [a nativist] students right to a so‐called political view. . . Do I really have to avoid saying I think nativism is bad?[] The eugenics movement was based in large part on immigrants destroying our country.
Bedars strawman argument is fallacious. Trump administration immigration policies and the Americans who support them have nothing to do with eugenics. To claim without evidence and by tenuous association that they do is repugnant. Dont Fire Me for Being a Liberal Propagandist
Much worse yet is Bedars display of extreme political intolerance toward the views of millions of his fellow Americans, among whom are, presumably, a number of his own students. Support for immigration law enforcement is by no means a fringe political perspective, even in Massachusetts. It is certainly not some sort of taboo that must be expunged from classroom debate, and Newton North guidelines explicitly tell teachers to teach about the reasoning behind different perspectives on immigration.
Yet, in remarkable language, Bedar demanded that the school allow him to propagandize against it, and to do so without any professional consequences: I have an obligation to teach civic duty and teach kids right and wrong, and about social justice. . . . This will probably be an unpopular opinion, but I dont actually think we should have the option of not discussing [social justice] issues. I feel responsible for doing so. . . . We can help kids interpret the lessons of the past better than anybody. I feel like a phony when Im not doing that. . . . But..this is hard. I dont want to get fired for being a liberal propagandist (emphasis added).
Bedar is, of course, wrong on multiple levels. A masters degree in teaching is risibly inadequate to qualify anyone as the arbiter of right and wrong, and a history teachers basic obligation is to teach history accurately and objectively. A sine qua non of that obligation is to avoid propaganda of any kind.
Unfortunately, Bedar does not seem to be very good at the actual basics of teaching history, much less at interpreting the lessons of the past, shortcomings for which he compensates by being a reasonably good propagandist. For example, Bedars erroneous belief to the contrary notwithstanding, the early twentieth-century eugenics movement was based less in conservative nativism than in the same New England progressivism Bedar preaches today. The eugenicist Immigration Restriction League was founded in Boston by three Harvard progressives. As The Guardian well puts it, eugenics is the skeleton that rattles loudest in the lefts closet. Propagandists Simplify Very Complex Events into Slogans
Indeed, if common cause with the eugenics movement is Bedars litmus test for approved opinions in the classroom, then opinions supporting deficit spending and birth control should be as forbidden there as nativism seems to be. Left-wing economist John Maynard Keynes called eugenics the most important, significant and, I would add, genuine branch of sociology which exists, and believed its implementation would be a great moment in the progress of civilization. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was an inveterate eugenicist who believed that the campaign for Birth Control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical in ideal, with the final aims of Eugenics.
All of this is not to argue over birth control, deficit spending, and which ideologies are responsible for what travesties. Rather, it is to say that history, politics, and ideology are complicated things. Yet, in the history lessons they teach, propagandist teachers like Bedar insist on reducing all of this complexity to a Manichean struggle between right and wrong, the essence of which they insipidly correlate with Democrat and Republican.
In that kind of lurid light, where no shades of gray can possibly exist, people who lack the right politics must pose, in Ibokettes words, a real, immediate, and present danger to human progress, and to all that is right and good. Men who light up the world in such stark contrast fill history books with their crimes. This Is Like My Childhood Education in the Soviet Union
The year after the Soviet Union fell, I entered fifth grade at State School No. 8 in the Siberian city of Tomsk, where I was born at the beginning of the end of that evil empire. Usually, Soviet children started learning the history of Russia in fifth grade, but my teacher told the class that she had nothing to teach us anymore. Left-wing activists are dug in at all stages of the American educational process from preschool to graduate school.
The old history books are useless now, I distinctly remember her telling us. They were full of Communist Party lies. Just like that, the entire monument of official Soviet history, built upon an ideological foundation of lies and held together by despotism, crashed as soon as the coercive power that had kept it upright for 74 years disappeared in an instant.
Undaunted by the failures of their comrades in the Soviet Union and other socialist hell-holes, left-wing activists are dug in at all stages of the American educational process from preschool to graduate school, where they seek to replicate the Soviet Unions abuse of its childrens minds with lurid lies.
Even science education is facing a hostile takeover by progressive luddites with scientific degrees who insist, as one biology PhD student did recently, that to think there are universal truths perpetuates a particular kind of able bodied white cisgender male logic. The result of all this left-wing obscurantism is a brainwashed Generation Z that inhabits a false reality colored in stylized black and white by leftist dogmathe same false reality that Soviet school and preschool battered into me as a child. The Teachers Administrators Back Them Up
After Bedar complained that he didnt want to get fired for being a liberal propagandist, his fellow history teacher, Ibokette, wrote back: David, if you get fired for doing exactly what history teachers, and indeed all rational and ethical‐minded adults should indeed be doing, I will be right behind you.
I wish this would happen, not because I want them punished, but because I think the way they teach history is a form of child abuse. But Bedar and Ibokettes superiors, all the way up the ladder, are fully on board with this abuse. Bedars direct supervisor, Newton North history department chair Jonathan Bassett, replied to his revolt against reason with this: David: Your essay is very good, and raises a lot of the questions that we are all dealing with. . . . We are in unprecedented times, and we are all struggling to do good.
The Left is abusing American high school education in its strugglenot to do good, but to gain and retain political power. The ongoing trend of growing political intolerance and ideological bigotry among the newest American adults will continue, and nothing good will come of it. In the Soviet Union, Ive seen what young people could be turned into, what I myself could be turned into. Trust me, America hasnt seen anything yet.
Ilya Feoktistov is a member of the board of directors of Americans for Peace and Tolerance.
Photo U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Cary Smith/Released
My late husband was Jewish; if he saw this he would spit and curse.
I can relate to this.
At open house I invited any parents who wanted to visit the class during school hours.
If a controversial subject came up, I treated it fairly and nuetrally but this did not happen often, because the subject was math.
However, the faculty learned my beliefs (because I was asked directly and knew some teachers who felt as I did so I answered honestly) mistake. When the grant I was hired on ran out the administration (which had changed since I was hired) found my teaching to be unworthy of tenure. Out I went.
I don’t know what would have been the case if another teacher had retired while I was being reviewed, probably still would have been out the door.
My older sister is a teacher in Maine, I live in Texas and am a veteran as all my fore fathers. I rarely talk to her because she moves and I move and we lose numbers. I’ve had rare communication since she left for college in north new England about 45 years ago. But I did have a conversation with her after one of the school shootings. I honestly think as leftist liberal she may be (for whatever reason) she understood GUN RIGHTS because many of her students were hunters in Maine.
People who live in rural areas typically understand the NEED for arms.
People who live in cities usually don’t................
What a powerfully written article. Thank you for posting this.
“Tied to attendance.”
Yes, if this was happening when my children were in public school, we would have home schooled. Defund the public schools that are reaping great rewards for indoctrinating the children with Socialism/Communism and anti American drivel.
The “poor” teachers are making six figures in many areas and the administration, principals and superintendents, are making high six figure incomes and indoctrinating, day by day!
This has got to be stopped!
I taught high school for ten years. I never talked politics with my students, who always wanted to know my politics. Whenever they’d ask, I’d reply, “What are the politics of your other teachers?” They reply instantly, “Oh, they’re all Democrats.” “So what am I?” I’d ask. They didn’t know because all I ever asked of them was to THINK and not what to think.
With staff, though, it was a different game. When one of my colleagues let it out that I’m a Republican — literally, the only one on the staff — one of my department teachers freaked out and refused to follow my guidance as Dept. Chair. My boss, a Yalie leftist “educator” (and the worst manager of humans ever) told her to ignore me. My other teachers were great, and although leftists to the bone, were respectful and willing to engage in honest discussion. Still, they pushed it on the kids.
This, btw, was at an urban, black school.
Nice post, thanks. So good that some people dig into things like this and expose them.
Well, we are probably talking about different things. You are talking about possible benefits.
I am talking about hostile work environments and limited advancement opportunities for those who choose other paths.
Agreed, many, but not all. Some swallow the crap hook, line, and sinker.
Useful idiots, those who don’t hold the real power.
Losing its customers certainly will stop it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.