Does anyone agree that Peterson is sowing feelings, but not logical progression to a principle from which to reason?
Is that Jungian?
I am hoping you are just drunk or drugged out...cause you certainly aren't making sense.
Read “12 Rules” and you’ll discover that Peterson only sows progress to a conclusion, based entirely on teaching the ability to critically think and reason. But Peterson is not going to take you by the hand and lead you to the conclusion - you have to do the hard, methodical work yourself. He is a deep thinker whose work remains highly accessible, and that is what most terrifies the left.