“He was constantly starting arguments and had displayed the gun before. The store owner tried to have him banned from the property. Yes sport, he was looking for a fight....”
Do you have a source for this information?
You can read more details in the link at the ORIGINAL THREAD from last month when the story first broke. You can even read the same comments from FReepers all over gain.
“He was constantly starting arguments” = he had before approached people who parked illegally, and politely told them to move.
“displayed the gun before” = one man who had parked illegally and gotten out of his car to yell at the man claims the guy pulled the gun on him and claimed the guy sadi he’d shoot him. There was no police report, no arrest, which suggests this didn’t actually happen in that fashion, because brandishing a gun is also an offense that the police would take seriously and investigate.
On the other hand, what difference does it make. “Well, yes, the guy was robbing him when he shot him, but he was just looking for fights, he pulled a gun on another guy who tried to rob him last month”.
In every case where the man is accused of starting something, the actual “something” was started by people committing an illegal act. It is kind of funny how people have gotten so used to their own entitlement that they feel no shame in actually COMPLAINING when someone tells them that they area illegally parked in a handicapped space.