Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: centurion316
I was an election judge for a number of years. (A glorified title for "volunteer clerk"). My experience was that 90% of the provisional ballots were from registered Democrats. They appeared to be mostly legitimate, but in any case we were not allowed to challenge or refuse them.

A close election would seem to always flip to the Democrats on a recount, even without fraud. I have seen many such results. It is a structural problem.

I am certain there is plenty of fraud of course. Mail-in ballots seem to be the principle vector. A turnout of 100% + in a precinct is the obvious tell.

I believe that close elections (less than 1% margin) should not be recounted, they should be redone.

38 posted on 08/13/2018 7:54:16 PM PDT by flamberge (What next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: flamberge

Or a turnout of >100%


39 posted on 08/14/2018 4:39:27 AM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge

bttt


43 posted on 08/14/2018 7:35:25 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson