Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/14/2018 11:45:31 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: caww

Soros will pay it. Anything to bring Trump down. Lies, hearsay, fiction, doesn’t matter.


2 posted on 08/14/2018 11:47:26 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

Make an example of her. Crush her.


3 posted on 08/14/2018 11:48:54 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

We should all pray a lot for our dear president who is putting up with constant attempts to ruin him, his family, and anyone who is helping him. He certainly doesn’t deserve this ridiculous contempt from such evil people.


4 posted on 08/14/2018 11:51:13 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

book proceeds? what book proceed?

The lien confiscates all book proceeds


5 posted on 08/14/2018 11:58:06 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12) Sanctuary is Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

Something is wrong with this story.

Why now?

This absolutely has the smell of an “op” to it.


6 posted on 08/14/2018 11:59:19 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

What are the odds some liberal judge will throw this out, saying the non-disclosure agreement won’t hold up due to freedom of speech?


7 posted on 08/14/2018 12:07:03 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww
According to a sample of the agreement provided to Secrets, she was required to keep proprietary information about the president, his companies or his family confidential and to never “disparage” the Trump family “during the term of your service and at all times thereafter.”

Sounds like the firm that wrote the agreement knows a thing or two because they have seen a thing or two.

10 posted on 08/14/2018 12:15:43 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

Let’s throw in an indictment for recording in a SCIF while Judge has his robes on.


13 posted on 08/14/2018 12:19:45 PM PDT by IamConservative (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

She could have walked away and said simply that they did not get along. She would have had a long career somewhere else. This will not work out well for her, IMHO.


14 posted on 08/14/2018 12:21:15 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

Go after all of the advance and profits from her book.


16 posted on 08/14/2018 12:41:11 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

She should be prosecuted for violating secrecy laws.


17 posted on 08/14/2018 12:47:19 PM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

Watch her get a gig on CNN.


18 posted on 08/14/2018 12:54:08 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

A smart lawyer should tell her to shut up from here on out.


21 posted on 08/14/2018 1:06:08 PM PDT by StoneRainbow68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: caww

note that the NDA was signed between two private individuals during the campaign. The latest NDA that Omarosa claims was given to her and she didn’t sign, was not as an employee of the WH.

Laura Trump, a private citizen who runs the 2020 campaign, offered the freshly-fired Omarosa a job with the new campaign. Working for the 2020 campaign would have required another NDA. Omarosa obviously refused the job, which would have been a 30K increase over her WH salary, already one of the highest in the WH. And then publically spat on the magnanimous offer in a sudden self-righteous quest to be the new Madonna of the ‘black cause’. Playing the race card and challenging legality of legal NDAs to excuse her own behavior seems to be a pattern lately, and just as transparent.


22 posted on 08/14/2018 2:43:55 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson