Interesting to hear that they are fact checking her.
Are they not wanting her front and center, becoming one of the faces of the Democrat party? It sure seems as if, up till now, she was the rock star, the rising star, the charismatic future of the party and all that.
It seems odd that a liberal publication would potentially embarrass one of their own with fact checking.
I believe they know people are not going to go for socialism.
She might not be polling well.
There is a fissure in the Dem party between the masked socialists(leadership) and unmasked socialists(younger dems).
Masked socialists understand that they have gotten where they are by keeping their mask on and appearing moderate.
The unmasked socialists are a product of the socialist education centers(public schools). They have heard nothing but socialism. They dont understand why anyone would oppose it. No critical thinking skills taught in the socialist eductation centers. And no opposing opinions.
One can only hope that the fissure widens and the unmasked socialists break away. One can only hope.
NOOOOOOO! We NEED people like Crazy-eyes, Ellison, Pelosi, Waters etc. to be in positions of power in the Dem Party!
What's interesting is the fact check conclusion. Fact checking is subjective, and usually the Post gives the most generous construction to their kindred spirits on the political side of the shop. The Post's opponents, nominally the Republicans, are fact checked using an entirely different standard.