Here’s a question to ask. How many of the 36% will actually vote for Trump? That’s where the disconnect may be hard to gauge.
Good question, and my good answer is that 36% is unlikely to vote for Trump’s opponent.
“How many of the 36% will actually vote for Trump?”
Rasmussen polls only likely voters.
That’s why the number is so much higher than other surveys.
All we need is for some of that 36% to vote for Trump, and some to not vote for the Dem.
Sitting out the election is half as good as voting for Trump and I bet we can get a lot to do that.
There will be a huge inner conflict between $$ in their pocket vs. traditional voting patterns.
That’s an interesting point.
I never believe this polling business whether it looks good or bad for us. There are so many factors, such as the one you pointed out, that make them worthless. Most notable would be the polls just before the last election that had all the dems believing Hitlery had won.
Polls are mostly propaganda tools.
In the privacy of the voting booth you vote for your wallet...And no guilt now cause they already voted for Obama...the first half black president.
“How many of the 36% will turn out to vote”?
The same amount percentage wise as turned out when his approval among blacks was 12%. Why would it be any less?