Architect of bin Laden raid issues stunning rebuke of Trump (Adm. McRaven)

CNN ^ | Aug. 16, 2018 | CNN

[Mark17]

McRaven has some role with University of Texas .

He is an Obama fellatior 1st Class

I have a feeling the vast majority of Generals are Obama butt boys, and can’t be trusted. They are definitely part of the swamp. In a military coup, I think they will not be on Trump’s side. We might have a bunch of Generals placed in hand cuffs, by senior enlisted people. I think it might be every enlisted man’s dream, to cuff up a General.

[caver]

I still don’t believe they got Bin Laden.

[McGruff]

Clinton-McRaven in 2016?

...There are rumors that he could be positioning himself to be Hillary Clinton’s vice president.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/211458-clinton-mcraven-in-2016

[itsahoot]

One problem: national security classified info is NOT subject to "freedom of speech".

I remember the outrage of the press when Jarrod's clearance was pulled. 😀

[Jack Hammer]

Oh, dear.... the admiral watched it all unfold while seated in his overstuffed chair.

Big deal.

[RideForever]

Sounds like the Admiral needs to be added to the watch list, a friend of Brennan’s is no patriot
___________________________

Someone should ask the Admiral what would happen if one of the Seal team texted the story from the plane on the trip home. That the equivalent of Brennan’s erratic behavior of leaking stories to CNN.

[100American]

Amen, exactly....

By Your words shall you be known...

[DoughtyOne]

There's a lot out there on McRaven.

He's not pristine by any measure.

Here are some articles on him.

Asked to step down from an organization leadership, due to perceived malfeasance.

(Google search)

LINK

[falcon99]

I would very much like to see Sec Mattis call in Adm McRaven and tell him that he, Mattis is removing his security clearance for showing very poor judgement in entering a political fight unnecessarily. Removing a clearance does not eliminate one’s free speech rights as the clearance has nothing to do with free speech. That is just the leftist/dem/media talking point for the unthinking. This Adm wanted to make a statement, fine, honor his request, but it should be done by Mattis, not Trump. But I doubt Mattis will do it.