I agree, I think he does have the best analysis.
Still. I try to steer myself at least a little bit away from my own confirmation bias. Bongino is a *very* passionate and very direct advocate for his theory of events, not that’s it’s “his” theory. Am I being bowled over?
As for Mifsud, there’s good reason to believe that our intel agys don’t *want* to find him, or for him to be found. And that’s easy enough for them, they just send him to a small obscure Italian or Greek island for an extended vacation.
With regard to Papa, I am unclear why there would be “a dozen” or “dozens” of lies/misstatements in the charging papers. Now I understand he was interviewed on at least 3 and possibly four multi-hour occasions and probably has about 01:30 worth of actual information to impart. He’s a pretty young guy, probably pretty naive; of course anyone on earth seems naive relative to the incredibly devious information planting story in which he has been caught up. FBI interrogators must have turned him around big time. I obviously have no way of knowing, but he clearly stepped into something many many feet above his head.
On weekends I get a lot of waking in for exercise. I load previous weeks Bongino podcasts into my cheapo MP3 player and listen to them while walking. Yes, Bongino gets exited and passionate but only about two times have I thought he was getting carried away. He is very precise with his language and when he has a new updated take or theory about the whole Mueller-Russian Collusion, he will let you know how certain he is. Whether you can take it to the bank or if he is still piecing it all together. He speaks in terms of 100% certainties and not 100% certain, still needs more info to roll in.