The idea that the nuclear bombing of Japan was a humanitarian act is set in stone. If you disagree you are some kind of lunatic. The bombing may have been necessary to impress the Russians but it did not necessarily shorten the war. The Japanese military was reluctant to surrender because they were aware of what was happening in Germany (The Morgenthau Plan). They were concerned about rape and pillage for good reason. The apparent insistence on unconditional surrender prolonged the conflict. Japanese pilots were not crazy. They sacrificed their lives for their country. Some people cannot understand this concept. The number of Russian casualties is frequently brought up. How many of these 26 million were killed by the Russians? The Russians could be accused of “stabbing Japan in the back” like Italy’s invasion of France. Their non-aggression pact was still valid. World War II may not have been the bloodiest human or natural catastrophe in history, accounting for more than 65 million dead. That honor might belong to Mao who is frequently credited with 100 million deaths. Thanks to FDR Russia was allocated two Chinese ports and concessions in Manchuria. How could he give our Chinese allies’ ports away? The Russians captured nearly a million slaves and the arms that they supplied to Mao. Had Japan been allowed to keep Korea and Manchuria they would have surrendered earlier and this would have saved many more American lives.
"Humanitarian" is not the right word here.
"War winning", or "life saving" are correct.
"Humanitarian" is what we did after the war to help nation's survive & rebuild.
Vehmgericht: " The bombing may have been necessary to impress the Russians but it did not necessarily shorten the war."
Nonsense.
The only other way to force Japanese surrender was a years long invasion of Japan, costing at least hundreds of thousands of US lives and millions of Japanese.
So A-bombs hastened surrender by at least months and potentially by years.
Vehmgericht: "The Japanese military was reluctant to surrender because they were aware of what was happening in Germany (The Morgenthau Plan).
They were concerned about rape and pillage for good reason."
There was no Morganthau plan in Germany, and Nuremberg trials did not begin until November, 1945.
However, German territory was reduced about 1/4, 10 million Germans expelled and about half of manufacturing capacity confiscated.
Yes, Germans were mistreated by Soviets and neglected by Americans, but we must notice to nowhere near the degrees Germans inflicted on people they conquered.
Vehmgericht: "The apparent insistence on unconditional surrender prolonged the conflict."
Terms offered Japan were the same as those imposed on other Axis powers.
It was a lesson learned from the First World War.
Vehmgericht: " Japanese pilots were not crazy.
They sacrificed their lives for their country.
Some people cannot understand this concept."
Everybody understands such tactics are born of weakness & desperation.
It speaks well of Japanese courage and devotion, but poorly of their leader's ability to think through their problem.
Vehmgericht: "The number of Russian casualties is frequently brought up.
How many of these 26 million were killed by the Russians?"
Well... suppose that number is one million, it changes the moral equation how, exactly?
Vehmgericht: "The Russians could be accused of 'stabbing Japan in the back' like Italy’s invasion of France.
Their non-aggression pact was still valid.
So the Japanese had decided sneak attacks were no longer Kosher? Amazing.
Vehmgericht: "World War II may not have been the bloodiest human or natural catastrophe in history, accounting for more than 65 million dead.
That honor might belong to Mao who is frequently credited with 100 million deaths."
So, do you claim Mao now occupies an even lower ring of H*ll than Hitler or Tojo?
Interesting... and your evidence for this is what, exactly?
Vehmgericht: "Thanks to FDR Russia was allocated two Chinese ports and concessions in Manchuria.
How could he give our Chinese allies’ ports away?"
So which ring does FDR occupy?
Vehmgericht: "Had Japan been allowed to keep Korea and Manchuria they would have surrendered earlier and this would have saved many more American lives."
And your evidence for this is what?
Didn't the First World War teach us that peace short of Unconditional Surrender only provides a respite for the aggressor nations to recover, recoup, regroup & prepare for Round Two?