Posted on 08/25/2018 7:16:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
“JFK had a legendary love life. Did one of his affairs connect him with the mob?” (CNN, promoting its Kennedy family hagiography, March 31, 2018.)
“Legendary” –whether morally-neutral or complimentary or both-- is not exactly the terminology CNN is employing with regard to President Trump’s “love life.”
Consensual and discreet adulterous affairs distant (both time-wise and geographically) from the White House do not qualify a “love life” as “legendary” with CNN.
But apparently, feeding amyl-nitrate poppers to a starstruck 19 year-old, taking her virginity in the very White House bed and directing her to fellate a 50-year old friend while watching does.
Or has CNN forgotten about Mimi Alford? A reminder:
“When a reveler (at a celebrity party) passed around a tray of sex drug amyl nitrate, writes Mimi Alford, the president (JFK) asked her if she wanted to try it. “I said no,’ Alford recalls, ‘but he just went ahead and popped the capsule and held it under my nose. I ran crying from the room".
A few months earlier an aghast Nikita Khrushchev was reading repeated pleadings and cajolings from Fidel Castro to quit pussyfooting around and launch a nuclear strike against the U.S. Just as the shaken Khrushchev frantically ordered his officers in Cuba to keep Fidel Castro and Che Guevara FAR AWAY from the launch buttons! and get the missiles OUT!”—at this very time JFK was romping in the White house bed with the 19 year-old Mimi Alford!
Mere months earlier dozens of Cuban exiles (many of them college kids about Mimi Alford’s age) were infiltrating Cuba and bringing out eye-witness reports of what remains the biggest military threat to the U.S. since 1812. In the process dozens were also dying by firing squad and torture at the hands of Castro and Che Guevara’s KGB- tutored secret police.
For all the good the Cubans did:
“Nothing but refugee rumors,” sneered JFK’s National Security advisor, McGeorge Bundy on ABC’s Issues and Answers on October 14, 1962. “Nothing in Cuba presents a threat to the United States,” continued the Ivy League luminary, barely masking his scorn for these hot-headed and deceitful Cubans and their sensational reports of missiles. “There’s no likelihood that the Soviets or Cubans would try and install an offensive capability in Cuba,” he scoffed.
And for all the thanks the Cubans got:
“There's fifty-odd-thousand Cuban refugees in this country," sneered President Kennedy himself the following day, "all living for the day when we go to war with Cuba. They're the ones putting out this kind of stuff."
Exactly 48 hours later U-2 photos sat on the President’s desk revealing those “refugee rumors,” complete with nuclear warheads, and pointed directly at Bundy, JFK and their entire staff of sagacious Ivy League wizards.
"We ended up getting exactly what we'd wanted all along,” snickered Khrushchev in his memoirs regarding Kennedy’s “resolution” of the resulting “crisis.”: “Security for Fidel Castro's regime and American missiles removed from Turkey. Until today, the U.S. has complied with her promise to not interfere with Castro and to not allow anyone else to interfere with Castro [italics mine].
After the Missile Crisis "resolution," the U.S. Coast Guard and even the British navy (when some intrepid exile freedom fighters moved their operation to the Bahamas and Kennedy notified his chum, British PM Harold Mc Millan of their intrepidness) shielded Castro from exile attacks. In the Florida Keys and Bahamas they were arresting and disarming the very exiles the CIA had been training and arming the month before.
In his diaries Khrushchev snickers further: "it would have been ridiculous for us to go to war over Cuba–for a country 8,000 miles away. For us, war was unthinkable." So much for the threat that so rattled the Knights of Camelot and inspired such cinematic and literary epics of drama and derring-do by their court scribes and court cinematographers (i.e. the MSM and Hollywood.)
Eighteen months after the botched Bay of Pigs invasion, two months after his deal with Khrushchev (and shortly after the amyl-nitrate party) a guilt-stricken JFK ransomed the surviving Bay of Pigs freedom-fighters back from Castro's dungeons. Living under a daily firing-squad sentence for almost two years these Cuban freedom-fighters –aware it would probably save their lives--had refused to sign the confession damning the “U.S. Imperialists” (the very nation, which for all they knew at the time, that had betrayed them on that beachhead.) “We will die with dignity!” responded their second-in-command Erneido Oliva to his furious KGB-trained interrogators, again and again and again.
To Castroites such an attitutde not only enrages, but baffles.
On Dec. 29, 1962, these Cuban freedom fighters, many on crutches others in wheelchairs gathered with their destitute and traumatized families in Miami’s Orange Bowl to hear President Kennedy address them. “I am here today not to be honored—but to pay honor,” intoned the U.S. president. “I know of no men in modern history who showed more courage under more difficult conditions than those before me today.”
The president continued in this vein and upon completing his tribute the Cuban freedom-fighters handed him their sacred battle flag, a gesture which surprised and seemed to deeply move the U.S. president.
“I promise to deliver this Brigade banner to you in a free Havana!" he beamed at the freedom-fighters and their loved-ones.
The stadium erupted: “CUBA LIBRE!” yelled the delirious crowd while hugging and cheering and sobbing. “CUBA-LIBRE!” yelled men (and boys) who’d snickered in the face of KGB torturers weeks earlier, but now wept openly. The hour of liberation seemed nigh, and with the full backing of “The Leader of the Free World.”
But AH!--two months earlier this same Leader of the Free World had made a different pledge to Khrushchev, ensuring anything but a Cuba Libre; promising, in fact, that Havana would remain Communist, as enforced by U.S. arms.
And the following fifty years showed which pledge the U.S. honored. The pledge to the Butcher of Budapest to preserve Castroite Stalinism has proven sacrosanct--while the pledge of liberty to the men who risked their lives to warn the U.S. of the greatest threat in her history was trashed.
Mimi Alford, on the other hand, claims the president was always perfectly honest with her.
Read Howie Carr’s Book, Kennedy Babylon: A Century of Scandal. The book details the extent of Kennedy corruption.
Every one of his articles pretty much answers the question, “who murdered JFK?”
Yes Trump paid for his women and didn’t shit and eat in the same place. Great pick up Humberto, way ta go!
POWER corrupts.....!!
.............................
That depends on the person. Power did not corrupt George Washington.Power will not corrupt Donald Trump. He is used to having power so it is nothing new to him.
“President Trump, You Are No JFK”
Is that a compliment?
....................................
Definitely! I could not stand President Kennedy nor his murdering brother Ted. I never voted for a Kennedy. They were all scumbags.
JFK as with all Kennedys are pieces of sheet
The Kennedys, Robert McNamara and Lyndon Johnson gave us 58,000 U.S. dead in a badly bungled and micromanaged war in Vietnam and tore our society half apart.
Yet people still dream of the “days of Camelot” and the Great Society. Geez!
Mimi Beardsley’s story checked out seven ways to Sunday. She was on the White House travel lists at times which was completely out-of-the-ordinary for an intern.
JFK was no conservative even if you cite his initial friendship with Joe McCarthy and his tax cuts. But his appointments as president: Ted Sorenson, Arthur Schlesinger, John Kenneth Galbraith, RFK, McGeorge Bundy, et al were solidly to the Left. His neither-here-nor- there actions with the Bay of Pigs showed extreme vacillation and weakness. His assassination plots against three foreign leader simultaneously (Trujillo, Castro, and Diem) were amateurish, criminal, and without an end game. Diem’ coup tied or flag to the future debacles and power vacuums in South Vietnam. His Peace Corps was and still is “a juvenile experiment” just as Eisenhower said it was.
And Kennedy would be a Republican in modern times.
............................................
Bullhockey!
Yeah, ‘cause before he started using drugs, he was a choir boy. So, it’s not his fault. See? How much his drug use caused him to be pretty useless as a president, can only be guessed.
LBJ besides Obama, was probably the worse and most dangerous president, America has ever had.
He was neither.
Thank God.
I know there are still some JFK loyalists left. He was charismatic. He was a far better actor than Ronald Reagan...that’s about all I got.
But I’m not denigrating your loyalty. It is what it is, and loyalty is an admirable characteristic.
Thank God! Bay of Pigs!!!
No he would have evolved just like his brother Ted and endorsed 0 just like Ted did. However yes his view at the time he lived would be over on our side today.
I defend Ted. He was too dumb and incompetent to get a real job so he went into politics where ignorant people mix with their own kind.
Read up on the 10940 World’s Trade Fair bombing and the Linderberg kidnapping and you will realize the Brits have NEVER been our “friend”.
I knew that I should have worded my response differently when I hit post.
One of his famous speeches:
“And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.”
This is so opposite to the message of the modern Democrat is pushing these days. A modern Democrat would be vilified if he said it today.
Whew! How lucky are we?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.